The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1239 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
Good morning. The bill does not say whether the duty of candour will apply to police officers who are off duty. Will you give a view as to why you think that the bill should cover that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
You just want clarity on that. You are not particularly arguing for off-duty officers to be included.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
Thank you for that.
My next question relates to whistleblowing. We have only scratched the surface of some of this stuff, to be honest, but I have not encountered any cases of whistleblowing in Police Scotland. We have had cases elsewhere. Is there a need for a definition of whistleblowing, given that it could mean a lot of different things? Some people might have seen something that they want to report, but are there any grey areas? To me, whistleblowing tends to involve a bigger systemic failure that it is in the public interest for someone to report. Can you comment on that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
Is there a particular problem with police officers not attending?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
However, there is no legal reason why someone cannot be told of a criminal allegation against them. Indeed, I asked the Lord Advocate about that last week when she gave evidence, because we had a specific case in front of us. I cannot remember the timescale involved, but the officer was not aware of the allegations for a considerable period of time. It was suggested that there might have been a legal reason for that, but, when I checked with the Lord Advocate last week, she said that there were no such legal reasons.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
I think that it was the week before. We heard about a case that took quite a period of time, and, last week, I asked the Lord Advocate whether there was any specific legal reason for an officer not being told. The officer that we heard from was on restricted duties while they were waiting.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
Good morning. Thank you for your evidence; it has been helpful to hear it.
You have partially answered some of my questions, which are around time limits and getting the balance right. The committee does not have a lot of information about the categories of complaints against police officers—we are a wee bit in the dark—but there are two scenarios that I can think of. If we insisted that the Government attach time limits, would that undermine the provisions in the bill?
The idea of extending proceedings against former police officers up to 12 months, or beyond if the PIRC thought it was proportionate to do so, seems to be generally welcomed. However, those police officers might have sought other employment and gone on to new lives during that time. Notwithstanding what you said about the possible complexity of the cases, would setting some time limits undermine the new provision?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
I would have thought that those were quite simple matters to deal with, although I do not know. I am thinking about serving police officers. We have heard about many instances in which it has taken up to two years to deal with such matters. To me, as a layperson, it seems a simple matter that should not take two years. We are trying to strike the balance of fairness. Despite what you have said about the power of police officers, it seems an awful long time to have a case hanging over them, so time limits might be appropriate in simple cases.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
It is when a case goes to the procurator fiscal that it can take up to six months, although the times are getting better.
I am thinking that complaints of assault against police officers must be quite common.