The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1604 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
At what point is that done? In a high-level domestic abuse offence, the person will have served a sentence. Does the process start on their release?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
When an offender who has committed a serious domestic abuse offence is released, who handles the monitoring arrangements for them while they are out? Is that done under MAPPA?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
I think that people are interested in the idea of having a register, although we can see its faults, because there would be concrete legal requirements for an offender to say that they are, for example, going on holiday or moving house. It seems straightforward that notification requirements might add something if there is currently a much shorter register of only the most serious offenders. Does MAPPA replicate that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
No, my question is more general than that—I will rephrase it. When domestic abuse offenders who have been tried in a solemn case—so we are talking about serious offenders—but who are not covered by MAPPA are on release from prison, victims worry about their safety. I have a few such cases at the moment, and in fact we all have. Having notification requirements involving the police that are like the requirements for people on the sex offenders register might give victims some peace of mind, because those would be more serious monitoring requirements. I know that there would be lots of problems with a register, but I am just posing that question. Is there perhaps a gap?
09:45Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
Good morning. As Sharon Dowey said, risk is my area of interest. We have heard quite a lot about the long register in the bill, so I understand all those points. What Sharon Dowey is getting at is whether we could explore a shorter list of the most serious domestic abuse offences—you would have to assume that sentencing reflects the level of seriousness. That is what I want to explore.
I think that I know what you will say about this, but let me just develop the point first. I am trying to understand who is covered by MAPPA and the differences between MAPPA and a register. I do not know whether Graham Robertson wants to come in, because he has already responded on this issue, but I think that it is important for the committee to understand who MAPPA covers. I am not asking about those who have committed a sexual offence but about those who have committed a domestic abuse offence. I think that it would be helpful to understand that. I know that you cannot give us the numbers.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
Who identifies, and decides, whether a domestic abuse offender—not a sexual offender—will be covered by MAPPA?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
Lastly, I am trying to understand the process for all domestic abuse offenders who are released. You say that some offenders could be identified as being in that high risk category, but others are not. What are the monitoring requirements for them on release? Are there any monitoring requirements for them, or is that variable?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
Okay, so they can be brought back in. Is there anything else?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
Minister, I understand the arrangements for MAPPA, and that there are variable conditions for those who are released who are not covered by MAPPA. Have you considered whether there could be an advantage in doing something else, as there is no way of tracking those offenders? An offence has to be quite serious to be covered by MAPPA, so maybe there should be some measure in between. For example, a serial offender on release might not be covered by MAPPA. That person might have monitoring conditions, but what if they do not? Might there be a gap there?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
I just want to make sure that I have understood that point. You are saying that the accused would be less likely to plead guilty if they would be put on the register.