The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2128 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
As members have heard, the UK Government introduced its bill on 2 September, and the bill will make changes to the sentencing framework and the management of offenders in England and Wales. Most of that bill applies to England and Wales, but, sometimes, when Westminster deals with criminal law matters, that means that something has to be done in this Parliament, too. As the cabinet secretary has said, Scotland cannot be less stringent on matters of national security and counterterrorism.
I have written a speech, but its contents have been covered pretty much word for word by the cabinet secretary. I do not think that there is any point in repeating those words, because the issue is quite clear.
It is unusual for a committee to deal with a legislative consent memorandum and for the Parliament be asked to vote on the motion the very next day, but the committee was pretty satisfied that there is no controversy in relation to the LCM. As members have heard, the essence of it is that long-term and short-term prisoners will be treated the same, as far as national security is concerned, and they will be released two thirds of the way into their sentence.
Scottish Labour will vote in favour of the motion this evening, and there is nothing more to add.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
And then it is decided under MAPPA?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
Are you saying that that serves the same purpose as a register? I know that there are other problems with a register, but would putting those offenders on a domestic abuse register fulfil the same purpose?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
No.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
At what point is that done? In a high-level domestic abuse offence, the person will have served a sentence. Does the process start on their release?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
When an offender who has committed a serious domestic abuse offence is released, who handles the monitoring arrangements for them while they are out? Is that done under MAPPA?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
I think that people are interested in the idea of having a register, although we can see its faults, because there would be concrete legal requirements for an offender to say that they are, for example, going on holiday or moving house. It seems straightforward that notification requirements might add something if there is currently a much shorter register of only the most serious offenders. Does MAPPA replicate that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
No, my question is more general than that—I will rephrase it. When domestic abuse offenders who have been tried in a solemn case—so we are talking about serious offenders—but who are not covered by MAPPA are on release from prison, victims worry about their safety. I have a few such cases at the moment, and in fact we all have. Having notification requirements involving the police that are like the requirements for people on the sex offenders register might give victims some peace of mind, because those would be more serious monitoring requirements. I know that there would be lots of problems with a register, but I am just posing that question. Is there perhaps a gap?
09:45Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
Good morning. As Sharon Dowey said, risk is my area of interest. We have heard quite a lot about the long register in the bill, so I understand all those points. What Sharon Dowey is getting at is whether we could explore a shorter list of the most serious domestic abuse offences—you would have to assume that sentencing reflects the level of seriousness. That is what I want to explore.
I think that I know what you will say about this, but let me just develop the point first. I am trying to understand who is covered by MAPPA and the differences between MAPPA and a register. I do not know whether Graham Robertson wants to come in, because he has already responded on this issue, but I think that it is important for the committee to understand who MAPPA covers. I am not asking about those who have committed a sexual offence but about those who have committed a domestic abuse offence. I think that it would be helpful to understand that. I know that you cannot give us the numbers.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
Who identifies, and decides, whether a domestic abuse offender—not a sexual offender—will be covered by MAPPA?