The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 132 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Davy Russell
In the light of the evidence that we have received, I recommend that, under rule 15.7 of standing orders, the committee closes the petition on the basis that it has raised relevant issues as part of the thematic evidence session with the Minister for Public Health and Women’s Health, who is the responsible minister.
Although there are potential benefits to providing schools with public access defibrillators, that might have a limited impact in some local authority areas. The Scottish Government supports using the strategic PADmap tool to ensure that pads are placed where they are most likely to be used.
In closing the petition, the committee could write to the Minister for Public Health and Women’s Health to highlight the substantive work that the committee has undertaken on this and other relevant petitions.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Davy Russell
Another thing is Police Scotland’s involvement, since the detainees are held on their premises. It might be worth while—
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Davy Russell
Yes, cabinet secretary, everyone agrees that we need energy security. However, to go back to the issue of initial planning consents for projects over 49MW, do you not think that all schemes should go through the local authorities, rather than only projects up to 49MW, which involve smaller schemes that would have a lower environmental impact?
Whether a project is over 49MW or over 149MW, it does not matter—the larger schemes have a much bigger environmental impact and affect local communities much more. Do you think that everything should, therefore, go through the local authority, and that probably only appeals should bypass that element of the process?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Davy Russell
I suggest that we write to the Minister for Public Health and Women’s Health, highlighting the areas of concern that remain outstanding as identified through the oral evidence and in the petitioner’s most recent submission.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Davy Russell
You mentioned ScotSTAR transfers. Obviously, the role of ScotSTAR will significantly increase when we move down to three units. Does ScotSTAR have the capacity? In your financial modelling, have you built in any costs for ScotSTAR to increase its capacity to manage the increase in demand?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Davy Russell
Based on your answer, I think that you are telling me that it has not been done yet.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Davy Russell
Yet the parents’ groups that I have heard from—and we had a chat with them—say that you are listening but are still just carrying on regardless.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Davy Russell
The convener mentioned the letter from the neonatal consultants in Glasgow. Do you have that letter?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Davy Russell
I suggest that we close the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders on the basis that the Scottish Government has been actively undertaking work to address the issues at the core of the petition, including having regular multi-agency engagement and making improvements in reporting and data gathering.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Davy Russell
I suggest closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders on the basis that the Scottish Government does not have any current plans to adjust the powers of the courts to impose absolute discharges in criminal cases. Also, if it is considered that the offence should not be punished but that the crime should be recorded and the offender should be made subject to notification requirements, courts have the option to admonish rather than absolutely discharge. The draft guidelines on the sentencing of rape include a minimum custodial sentence of four years and make no provision for absolute discharge as a disposal within the proposed sentencing ranges for rape or sexual assault. This means that a court imposing an absolute discharge would be taking a decision not to follow a guideline and would have to state its reasons for that decision. The Crown can appeal sentences of absolute discharge if it is considered to be potentially unduly lenient.