The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 110 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Davy Russell
Yes, but my original point was that, if that is the case and that transfer is the number 1 priority, there must be strain on the system somewhere else. If this is going to be used a lot more, some people will be waiting a lot longer for other things.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Davy Russell
Why was it not brought to the attention of this committee until now? It was not you who told me; it was somebody else. I think that the letter is relevant, because they are expert people as well.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Davy Russell
I wonder whether the committee would consider closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders on the basis that the Scottish Government has not indicated that it will take forward the aims of the petition, and has stated that raising the school starting age and introducing a kindergarten stage would represent a fundamental change in the scope of education in Scotland and a significant structural change in the provision of education. There would be a number of significant delivery implications in raising the school starting age, including for the early learning and childcare school workforce, infrastructure, legislation and the curriculum framework, which would need to be fully analysed and costed.
It is therefore unlikely that the petition’s ask could be achieved at this point in the parliamentary session and the committee is limited in the actions that it can take to progress the petition in the time remaining in this session.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Davy Russell
Obviously, there will be more transportation and logistics involved when transporting mothers and babies. When a transfer has to take place, will it be the general ambulance service or will they need to make their own way to the units?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Davy Russell
As part of the review, Bliss has said—I read this last night—that it did not consult parents because it was not in their terms of reference.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Davy Russell
You have said that travelling is not good for the baby, but you have also referred to appropriate capacity being available in the alternative unit. The nearest unit to Wishaw is Glasgow, which is at or near capacity. As a result, capital investment would be needed to increase capacity before there was any decision to close Wishaw. Is that right, or sensible?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Davy Russell
How easy is it to identify mothers who might be prone to giving birth prematurely? Is there any methodology that you would use, or pre-work activity that you would do, to ensure that the mother is in the right place closer to the right time?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Davy Russell
Dr Wardle mentioned that there is some evidence to back the reduction from eight down to three, but he did not say that there was a lot of evidence—he referred to the fact that he had never visited the sites and that it was more of a desktop exercise. Should the reduction be done in stages to see how it is working, rather than diving from eight to three?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Davy Russell
Thank you.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Davy Russell
Do you accept the potential for bias or conflict of interest in relation to the membership of the sub-group and the expert group?