The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 132 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Davy Russell
Another thing is Police Scotland’s involvement, since the detainees are held on their premises. It might be worth while—
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Davy Russell
Right. In your opening statement, you mentioned having more community schemes, which would be great. However, the price of grid connections for local schemes is extortionate and the connections take more than five years. If a community were to do a local scheme, it could wait for an eternity, and the apparatus could be out of date before there is a connection. Connections are not affordable, which makes schemes less viable.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Davy Russell
I know for a fact that my local planning authority, South Lanarkshire, would like a bigger say. I may be digressing a bit, but there is a battery storage scheme in East Renfrewshire, yet all the disruption is in South Lanarkshire. Because the scheme is bigger than 49MW, the local authorities have been bypassed.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Davy Russell
I suggest that we write to the Minister for Public Health and Women’s Health, highlighting the areas of concern that remain outstanding as identified through the oral evidence and in the petitioner’s most recent submission.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Davy Russell
Another thing is Police Scotland’s involvement, since the detainees are held on their premises. It might be worth while—
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Davy Russell
I know for a fact that my local planning authority, South Lanarkshire, would like a bigger say. I may be digressing a bit, but there is a battery storage scheme in East Renfrewshire, yet all the disruption is in South Lanarkshire. Because the scheme is bigger than 49MW, the local authorities have been bypassed.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Davy Russell
I suggest that we write to the Minister for Public Health and Women’s Health, highlighting the areas of concern that remain outstanding as identified through the oral evidence and in the petitioner’s most recent submission.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Davy Russell
In the light of the evidence that we have received, I recommend that, under rule 15.7 of standing orders, the committee closes the petition on the basis that it has raised relevant issues as part of the thematic evidence session with the Minister for Public Health and Women’s Health, who is the responsible minister.
Although there are potential benefits to providing schools with public access defibrillators, that might have a limited impact in some local authority areas. The Scottish Government supports using the strategic PADmap tool to ensure that pads are placed where they are most likely to be used.
In closing the petition, the committee could write to the Minister for Public Health and Women’s Health to highlight the substantive work that the committee has undertaken on this and other relevant petitions.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Davy Russell
Yes, cabinet secretary, everyone agrees that we need energy security. However, to go back to the issue of initial planning consents for projects over 49MW, do you not think that all schemes should go through the local authorities, rather than only projects up to 49MW, which involve smaller schemes that would have a lower environmental impact?
Whether a project is over 49MW or over 149MW, it does not matter—the larger schemes have a much bigger environmental impact and affect local communities much more. Do you think that everything should, therefore, go through the local authority, and that probably only appeals should bypass that element of the process?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Davy Russell
Right. In your opening statement, you mentioned having more community schemes, which would be great. However, the price of grid connections for local schemes is extortionate and the connections take more than five years. If a community were to do a local scheme, it could wait for an eternity, and the apparatus could be out of date before there is a connection. Connections are not affordable, which makes schemes less viable.