The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 132 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Davy Russell
It is a reserved matter, because general telecommunications policy remains reserved to the UK Government. Ofcom guidance states that providers should offer solutions to enable
“access to emergency organisations for at least one hour in the event of a power outage”.
The Scottish Government has committed, via a national islands plan, to work with key stakeholders to strengthen preparedness and response planning, including in relation to digital infrastructure. Therefore, I recommend that we close this petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Davy Russell
The other thing to note is that Police Scotland is already amending its databases to take into account information on other types of crime, so it cannot be too difficult for it to adjust its approach further to take this issue into consideration.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Davy Russell
I totally agree. So far, allowing local escalation has meant that there are no hard and fast guidelines. Failure occurs where there is no structured guideline.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Davy Russell
Keeping the petition open for the next parliamentary session will allow us to hear evidence from both sides.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Davy Russell
I was thinking that there is a review of other cases, including grooming gang cases, which links in here. Perhaps that review could also consider this issue.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Davy Russell
The other thing to note is that Police Scotland is already amending its databases to take into account information on other types of crime, so it cannot be too difficult for it to adjust its approach further to take this issue into consideration.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Davy Russell
What progress has the expert working group made, and does it involve the same people who failed in the system that Mr Ewing referred to?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Davy Russell
It is a reserved matter, because general telecommunications policy remains reserved to the UK Government. Ofcom guidance states that providers should offer solutions to enable
“access to emergency organisations for at least one hour in the event of a power outage”.
The Scottish Government has committed, via a national islands plan, to work with key stakeholders to strengthen preparedness and response planning, including in relation to digital infrastructure. Therefore, I recommend that we close this petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Davy Russell
In the light of the evidence that we have received, I recommend that, under rule 15.7 of standing orders, the committee closes the petition on the basis that it has raised relevant issues as part of the thematic evidence session with the Minister for Public Health and Women’s Health, who is the responsible minister.
Although there are potential benefits to providing schools with public access defibrillators, that might have a limited impact in some local authority areas. The Scottish Government supports using the strategic PADmap tool to ensure that pads are placed where they are most likely to be used.
In closing the petition, the committee could write to the Minister for Public Health and Women’s Health to highlight the substantive work that the committee has undertaken on this and other relevant petitions.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Davy Russell
Yes, cabinet secretary, everyone agrees that we need energy security. However, to go back to the issue of initial planning consents for projects over 49MW, do you not think that all schemes should go through the local authorities, rather than only projects up to 49MW, which involve smaller schemes that would have a lower environmental impact?
Whether a project is over 49MW or over 149MW, it does not matter—the larger schemes have a much bigger environmental impact and affect local communities much more. Do you think that everything should, therefore, go through the local authority, and that probably only appeals should bypass that element of the process?