The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 110 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Davy Russell
The other thing to note is that Police Scotland is already amending its databases to take into account information on other types of crime, so it cannot be too difficult for it to adjust its approach further to take this issue into consideration.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Davy Russell
What progress has the expert working group made, and does it involve the same people who failed in the system that Mr Ewing referred to?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Davy Russell
In the light of the evidence that we have received, I recommend that, under rule 15.7 of standing orders, the committee closes the petition on the basis that it has raised relevant issues as part of the thematic evidence session with the Minister for Public Health and Women’s Health, who is the responsible minister.
Although there are potential benefits to providing schools with public access defibrillators, that might have a limited impact in some local authority areas. The Scottish Government supports using the strategic PADmap tool to ensure that pads are placed where they are most likely to be used.
In closing the petition, the committee could write to the Minister for Public Health and Women’s Health to highlight the substantive work that the committee has undertaken on this and other relevant petitions.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Davy Russell
Yes, cabinet secretary, everyone agrees that we need energy security. However, to go back to the issue of initial planning consents for projects over 49MW, do you not think that all schemes should go through the local authorities, rather than only projects up to 49MW, which involve smaller schemes that would have a lower environmental impact?
Whether a project is over 49MW or over 149MW, it does not matter—the larger schemes have a much bigger environmental impact and affect local communities much more. Do you think that everything should, therefore, go through the local authority, and that probably only appeals should bypass that element of the process?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Davy Russell
Another thing is Police Scotland’s involvement, since the detainees are held on their premises. It might be worth while—
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Davy Russell
Right. In your opening statement, you mentioned having more community schemes, which would be great. However, the price of grid connections for local schemes is extortionate and the connections take more than five years. If a community were to do a local scheme, it could wait for an eternity, and the apparatus could be out of date before there is a connection. Connections are not affordable, which makes schemes less viable.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Davy Russell
I know for a fact that my local planning authority, South Lanarkshire, would like a bigger say. I may be digressing a bit, but there is a battery storage scheme in East Renfrewshire, yet all the disruption is in South Lanarkshire. Because the scheme is bigger than 49MW, the local authorities have been bypassed.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Davy Russell
I suggest that we write to the Minister for Public Health and Women’s Health, highlighting the areas of concern that remain outstanding as identified through the oral evidence and in the petitioner’s most recent submission.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Davy Russell
I know for a fact that my local planning authority, South Lanarkshire, would like a bigger say. I may be digressing a bit, but there is a battery storage scheme in East Renfrewshire, yet all the disruption is in South Lanarkshire. Because the scheme is bigger than 49MW, the local authorities have been bypassed.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Davy Russell
In the light of the evidence that we have received, I recommend that, under rule 15.7 of standing orders, the committee closes the petition on the basis that it has raised relevant issues as part of the thematic evidence session with the Minister for Public Health and Women’s Health, who is the responsible minister.
Although there are potential benefits to providing schools with public access defibrillators, that might have a limited impact in some local authority areas. The Scottish Government supports using the strategic PADmap tool to ensure that pads are placed where they are most likely to be used.
In closing the petition, the committee could write to the Minister for Public Health and Women’s Health to highlight the substantive work that the committee has undertaken on this and other relevant petitions.