The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 420 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Tim Eagle
I have perhaps not fully understood that. It is about land for a house as much as about a house that is already on a croft. No?
Could you explain that again? I have misunderstood. If a croft—no. I will stop my question. I think I understand what you are saying. I think I do, anyway. Crofting law is tricky.
I will move on to boundaries being remapped. Brian, you said that those provisions are “a recipe for disaster”. Could you explain that a bit more?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Tim Eagle
Good morning. I have a couple of questions: one on decrofting and another on boundary changes.
I will start with decrofting. My understanding is that the bill does two major things: first, it removes decrofting without a stated purpose; secondly, it limits the right to decroft a house to one per crofter. Do you have any thoughts on that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Tim Eagle
Section 14.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Tim Eagle
No. I wish you could.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Tim Eagle
I will go back to my previous point. I am trying to get my head back into gear around the house site issue. I am not an expert in this, but my understanding is that you can build a house on a piece of croft land. There would be nothing in the example that Katie MacKay gave that would prevent another family from building a house without needing to decroft that land.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Tim Eagle
Right. So, you could do that with private funding, but you could not take out a mortgage to do it.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Tim Eagle
I will turn to Eilidh Ross, if you do not mind. I am not trying to put you in conflict here—you said that you were fine with that. However, if we want thriving rural communities, surely that does not work. That makes sense, does it not? Why would we want that in the bill?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Tim Eagle
Okay—that makes sense.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Tim Eagle
Yes—I get that. I was not clear on that, but I am clearer now as to what you are trying to get at.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Tim Eagle
Thank you, convener, and hello, everybody. I am sorry that I cannot be there in person today. It is a fascinating discussion. David Anderson has just touched on exactly the issue that I was going to raise; I asked this question in the earlier session. When I was out over the summer, trust came up a lot. Disagree with me on that if you think I am wrong, but, when I am at the harbours—obviously, I am in the north-east, and I connect with what people are saying, which is that this is about more than fishing; this industry is the cultural lifeblood of the people of Scotland—trust in science comes up a lot.
The practical part of me says that, if we do this, and there seems to be broad support around it, how do we take the data that we have—one of the earlier witnesses said that we have loads of data because we have been doing this for years—and make that as open and easy to understand as possible, as a baseline? How do we then monitor effectively, both with scientists and with your members, and how do we disseminate that information? Any further thoughts that you have on that would be gratefully received so that, if this happens, we can show what the future will look like, whether things are getting better and so on.