The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1356 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Angela Constance
Yes.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Angela Constance
No—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Angela Constance
Before I hand over to officials, I will briefly say that the purpose of all the work, whether it is the work that has been done with Police Scotland, the independent review by the various inspection bodies or the work of the national strategic group, is to give us a better understanding of the harms that are current and present to our children right here, right now, and of how that threat is evolving. Those inquiries might lead to further work and the establishment of a public inquiry, because we have an open mind and every option will be considered.
With regard to the detail of the review, Iona Colvin or Andrew Watson might want to start.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Angela Constance
I do not have it in front of me.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Angela Constance
I do not know, Mr Ross. I do not actually know what information you asked for in the freedom of information request.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Angela Constance
I can certainly look at if and how that can be done. I am conscious—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Angela Constance
I will certainly consider that. If I may, I will perhaps explain my thinking at the time about why I did not adjust the Official Report. I will then address the point that you are making about the here and now.
At the time that I received Professor Jay’s letter, I did not, as we all know, correct the Official Report. Essentially, my view of the intervention that I made on Mr Kerr was that I was making a general debating point about the need to get on with the work.
Professor Jay said in her letter that she wanted her position to be clarified. She also said in her letter that the quote that I used was correct, but, of course, she added context to that. It was simply not clear to me how I would correct the Official Report and what I would put into it.
I am quite sure that I am not the only MSP who has ever had to correct the Official Report. I have done that in the past, although not often. Over a number of years, it is something that I have done. Normally, that has been because a quote was wrong, a word was wrong, names were wrong or figures were wrong. I was not sure how making such a correction would do justice to the clarification that Professor Jay was seeking.
I am also aware, as the committee will be aware, that how the matter was clarified and remedied via officials was put to Professor Jay, and that she was content with a clarification in the minutes of the national strategic group, which is an important group. The minutes are publicly available. That was a course of action that Professor Jay agreed to.
On the request that the convener has articulated and that Alexis Jay has spoken to this morning, I will look at that again and see how we can do that. My understanding is that there is a time limit for correcting the Official Report, but I can give you an undertaking that I will look at that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Angela Constance
I cannot answer the specific nature of your question. Obviously, I have been a parliamentarian for a long time now, and I certainly considered that when I received Professor Jay’s letter. As is the norm with correspondence in relation to which further advice or information is required, I would routinely get such advice from officials. That would apply to any correspondence that was perhaps of a more sensitive nature.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Angela Constance
As Mr Kidd says, child protection is led by my colleagues in education. However, it is a cross-Government endeavour in the same way that we have a cross-Government mission to tackle child poverty, for example. Every minister has a responsibility for the protection of children, which cuts across justice, housing, education and transport, and that is not an exhaustive list.
For my part, in relation to justice, it is about the detection and disruption of behaviour. Police Scotland is currently looking at past and present cases of interest that relate to group-based abuse and the exploitation of children and vulnerable adults. That work is particularly important and it is something that I hold dear.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Angela Constance
Yes—you have done an inquiry into inquiries, Mr Mason, but I go back to the point about terms of reference. The terms of reference are important in ensuring a specific focus. They need to have enough flexibility because the chair is independent and we want them to be able to follow the evidence. There are some constraints under the current legislation, and I am sure that all colleagues will be looking at FPAC’s work with interest.