The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 378 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 April 2024
Foysol Choudhury
Non-governmental—so, as in the example just given.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 April 2024
Foysol Choudhury
That is correct, yes.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 April 2024
Foysol Choudhury
I suggest that we write to the Scottish Government to ask when its latest review of information sources and decisions relating to the pause in or withdrawal of Covid-19 guidance took place, and what the outcome of that review was.
We could also write to stakeholders to seek their views on the action called for in the petition. Those stakeholders could include the Royal College of Nursing, Scottish Care and the Health and Social Care Alliance Scotland. We could also write to the Care Inspectorate to ask how “adequate and suitable” ventilation is defined in practice and how it assesses and enforces the ventilation standards.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Foysol Choudhury
Both the Faculty of Advocates and the Sheriffs and Summary Sheriffs Association have said that section 23 of the bill could be modified to deal with exceptional circumstances in which a judicial factor had acted unreasonably but not negligently in relation to litigation and so could be found personally liable for legal costs. Does the commission have any comments on the current policy and on the drafting of section 23?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Foysol Choudhury
Do any changes need to be made to clarify things?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Foysol Choudhury
Section 34 sets out the rule that discharge usually frees the judicial factor from liability as a factor under civil law. Section 38 requires the Accountant of Court to report to the court where “serious misconduct” or other material failures are found. The court then has a discretion to dispose of the matter as “it considers appropriate”. For the benefit of the committee, what is the commission’s understanding of the interrelationship between the two provisions? Does the commission think that any drafting changes are required to improve clarity?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Foysol Choudhury
Normally, the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission acts as a gatekeeper for all complaints about solicitors in Scotland although a complaint about conduct may be referred back to the Law Society to determine its substance. Section 38 of the bill places a duty on the accountant to report misconduct or failure of a judicial factor to their professional body. Is there therefore a potential policy issue in relation to bypassing the SLCC’s usual role and applying a different threshold for referral to the Law Society than the SLCC is required to apply?
11:15Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 20 March 2024
Foysol Choudhury
I asked a few questions on the issue, as well, and I agree with Fergus that we are not getting any straight answers from the Government. We should write.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 20 March 2024
Foysol Choudhury
If the majority is in favour of closing, yes. However, I still think that, since the Scottish Government has not done anything at all on this, we should write to ask whether it has any plans.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 20 March 2024
Foysol Choudhury
Good morning, Deputy First Minister. Could you change the regulation, even though the current position is not to change it?