The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 778 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Lorna Slater
That is brilliant. I will go back to the point about combining resources and having things such as a one-stop shop or portal. Are there any issues in relation to affordability or maybe even interaction with regard to sharing office space, websites and even being more physically closely located, or would there be issues in relation to trust in that regard?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Lorna Slater
Yes—please cover that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Lorna Slater
I have several questions, so I will put them into two clumps. I am asking questions about the rules in the new regulations on the making up and keeping of the registers. With no requirement for verification or update of the registers, how can accuracy be assured and fraud be prevented? How are out-of-date entries removed, for example when a debt has been paid or a pledge has been sold, and how are the registers updated if a pledge is transferred to a different creditor?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Lorna Slater
It was about keeping the registers up to date in terms of when entries should be removed because a pledge has been sold or a debt has been repaid.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Lorna Slater
So, there is no fee incurred for keeping a register up to date.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Lorna Slater
It is on the creditors and the debtors, as it were—the person who has made the pledge—to keep track of it. Is that correct?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Lorna Slater
Do we not have any concerns about the fact that a debtor’s information is publicly available in that way? In fact, if I understand correctly, that is the point of having the registers.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Lorna Slater
Uploads are checked, but if I find out that my information is in a scanned document or something else that got through the check, is there a method by which I can request that that information be corrected or redacted, given that I am not one of the two parties that can do the corrections?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Lorna Slater
We have talked a little bit about information accuracy for the creditor and the debtor. My question is about third parties. Other documents might have been uploaded as evidence for the asset that is being pledged—for example, invoices, which might include customer or individual information. On the point about customer databases being proof of the value of the asset, how does personal information get redacted from that supporting information? It is not about the creditor or the debtor, but the fact that you have all those customers is evidence of the asset. How is the privacy around that information assured, and how can that information be appropriately redacted?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Lorna Slater
Thank you.