Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 21 October 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 882 contributions

|

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Skills Delivery

Meeting date: 26 March 2025

Lorna Slater

My final question goes back to apprenticeships. How do we achieve parity of esteem between apprenticeships and the highers and university route? One suggestion that I have heard is that we should change the name from “highers” or make apprenticeships higher equivalent. What are your thoughts on that?

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Skills Delivery

Meeting date: 26 March 2025

Lorna Slater

Thanks for that.

My next question is about the delivery of apprenticeships through colleges versus other training providers. I realise that there is some push and pull in that respect: colleges are always desperate for more funds, so they would like to take on more of the apprenticeship training role, but employers including Lothian Buses, which the committee has visited, say that colleges are inflexible. They work to the academic year, which means that, if you employ someone in January, they cannot start training at the college until September. Moreover, colleges have trouble getting lecturers to do this kind of work, and it can mean an apprentice having to go to college three mornings a week instead of one day a week, which disrupts their work.

How do we deal with that balance? Colleges definitely want more money, but they do not seem to be up to the job of delivering the skills in the way that businesses need them to. They cannot keep up with the tech, and they cannot deliver on the timelines.

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Skills Delivery

Meeting date: 26 March 2025

Lorna Slater

Is there an issue with the funding model for colleges, too? Colleges seem to be very fixed when it comes to the academic year, with the struggle to get lecturers and so on. One of the things with apprenticeships is that the funding is only available once you have achieved a certain outcome, whereas colleges get their funding every October, no matter what. Would conditionality of funding on outcomes for colleges help them shift faster?

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Skills Delivery

Meeting date: 26 March 2025

Lorna Slater

Thank you.

Finally, I have heard good things about the expertise in SDS with regard to supporting apprenticeships, particularly from the trade unions, which are very concerned that that expertise will be lost with the move to the Scottish Funding Council. I forget how many staff you have working on this—I think that it is in the region of 100 or so—and we do not yet know how many of them will be moved over. The trade unions are very worried about losing the skills and expertise in delivering apprenticeships when that funding is moved to SFC.

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Skills Delivery

Meeting date: 26 March 2025

Lorna Slater

I have two slightly smaller questions—Murdo Fraser has been asking bigger questions.

I was an electromechanical engineer in my former life, and one of my abiding interests is in how we get an improved gender balance in the green skills area. Did you look at that? Where might the key points be in the system to address the terrible gender imbalance in things like construction and engineering?

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Skills Delivery

Meeting date: 26 March 2025

Lorna Slater

Thank you.

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Skills Delivery

Meeting date: 26 March 2025

Lorna Slater

Thank you very much.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 20 March 2025

Lorna Slater

I will direct my final question to Dr Elliott, although others, including Dr Gill, may have a view as well. You can see the problem that is before us when it comes to SPCB-supported bodies. What steps could be taken to give a more coherent view? We are having trouble even in defining the bodies into categories or groups, because there is so much messy overlap. What would a more coherent model look like?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 20 March 2025

Lorna Slater

Thank you. I have a few more questions, but I see that Dr Gill wants to come in on that point before I move on.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 20 March 2025

Lorna Slater

It might take us down a rabbit hole, convener. I think that I will leave it with you.