The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2800 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Sue Webber
This is the section of discussion that we have been anticipating will be a little bit lengthy, and I am sure that all members will want to contribute. My question will be quite open, to allow you to expand as much as you can.
Clearly, much of the concern is around the mechanism of the regional poll process that is provided for in the bill and the practical concerns or challenges that we need to be cognisant of. There is a lot to consider in that. Convener, you mentioned the specific challenges that a large region would face, but, being an Edinburgh-based Lothian girl, I contest that some of the cities might have different challenges that are equally challenging.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Sue Webber
My questions are about the mechanisms for removing an MSP and they are all for Jenny Brotchie, so Sarah Mackie can sit back and put her feet up for a bit.
The bill provides that there should be a process for removing an MSP if they fail to physically attend the Parliament for 180 days. This committee would be involved in taking a view on whether such an absence should be classed as a valid reason for removal. Does that process raise data protection and privacy issues that the committee should be mindful of?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Sue Webber
No, it is not you. Annie Wells coughed as you were speaking.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Sue Webber
You mentioned that members of the Parliament have to understand that there is a valid reason, but it is equally important that members of the public understand that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Sue Webber
With complexity comes cost and all sorts of resource pressures.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Sue Webber
That draws us back to your earlier comment about the proportionality of costs.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Sue Webber
But we are not elected in the same way, are we?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Sue Webber
You spoke about confusion among voters. Would that regional poll process be clear enough for voters? We all know that different election mechanisms can come along and be confusing. If the process is not clear, how could it be improved?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Sue Webber
You mentioned ways to protect the individual, including mechanisms that would use the corporate body. I will read out my next question from our briefing because, when it comes to data, I would rather not trip myself up. Would there be any possible concerns regarding data protection and privacy issues if the process involved reporting to the Parliament in every instance in which the committee considered the absence of a member, including those in which the MSP’s absence was judged to be valid?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Sue Webber
Maybe we can discuss that at another time. What do we have to do now in relation to reporting to the Parliament? I am just throwing that question out there.