The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2987 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Sue Webber
That was the question that I was going to ask, convener.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Sue Webber
Section 11 of the bill proposes repealing section 48A of FOISA, which prevents the Scottish Information Commissioner from investigating the handling of information requests by its own office. You have adopted a neutral position on that. I was wondering whether you had assessed or reached a position on whether the exclusions for the Lord Advocate and the procurators fiscal should also be repealed. If you have not, what factors would you need to take a position?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Sue Webber
That is fine. I will not ask the next question, because it has been answered.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Sue Webber
It would be helpful to understand why you take that position.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Sue Webber
Have the codes been updated often in the past 20 years?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Sue Webber
In relation to our international standing, we have heard that, if the power was removed, our legislation would rank even better in the world. What are your thoughts on that? Do you not want to see that progress?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Sue Webber
Surely you realise that the relationship that a patient has with their healthcare practitioner, such as their GP, is unique. That trust is unparalleled. It is very rare for people to turn up at their GP or their consultant armed with information about the options available to them. If doctors were to raise assisted suicide unprompted, it would mean the complete devastation of that relationship—it is not a neutral act. Jackie Baillie spoke about young people at length. In my heart, I just feel that I cannot imagine how there could be any trust between me and a healthcare practitioner if they brought that up with me unprompted. You must understand that challenge.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Sue Webber
I hope that the member might consider it somewhat ironic that, in earlier amendments, we were looking to collate data on side effects of these drugs and how patients interacted with them while carrying out their own deaths, and the challenge with the dissemination of such information was: when might it not be inappropriate?
We are talking here about public dissemination, not dissemination through the sorts of clinical channels that exist right now to allow people to move on with medical decisions and to share information. As I have said, this is more about attempting to follow the Online Safety Act 2023; after all, you do not find many clinicians sharing their medical practice on TikTok.
As for Pam Duncan-Glancy’s amendment on advertising, we will want to ensure that we prohibit the dissemination of information on services that are provided, as well as the substances, because you might start to get inappropriate advertisements in that respect. Indeed, one can envisage some of the gross and inappropriate advertising that might materialise if that is not prohibited. I am talking about both subtle and direct advertising, because marketing is extremely powerful. We see it all around us, including in the sort of influencing that you get on social media, and we really must do everything that we can to prohibit that sort of thing.
With that, I conclude my remarks.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Sue Webber
It is aimed at professionals who are involved in the medical and scientific field. I would say yes to your clarification: it is aimed at those who are seeking to—it is challenging for me to say this—make changes to the substances that are involved in assisted dying. My earlier amendments were about some of the substances’ challenging side effects and understanding how all the substances interact with various individuals—because, after all, we are all unique in how we interact with medicines.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Sue Webber
Yes, that subsection is there to allow the appropriate sharing of information—not for it to be shared in ways that might be deemed inappropriate and through which it could be used by the vulnerable individuals who I alluded to in my commentary.