Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 9 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2987 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 November 2025

Sue Webber

That was the question that I was going to ask, convener.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 November 2025

Sue Webber

Section 11 of the bill proposes repealing section 48A of FOISA, which prevents the Scottish Information Commissioner from investigating the handling of information requests by its own office. You have adopted a neutral position on that. I was wondering whether you had assessed or reached a position on whether the exclusions for the Lord Advocate and the procurators fiscal should also be repealed. If you have not, what factors would you need to take a position?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 November 2025

Sue Webber

That is fine. I will not ask the next question, because it has been answered.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 November 2025

Sue Webber

It would be helpful to understand why you take that position.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 November 2025

Sue Webber

Have the codes been updated often in the past 20 years?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 November 2025

Sue Webber

In relation to our international standing, we have heard that, if the power was removed, our legislation would rank even better in the world. What are your thoughts on that? Do you not want to see that progress?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 18 November 2025

Sue Webber

Surely you realise that the relationship that a patient has with their healthcare practitioner, such as their GP, is unique. That trust is unparalleled. It is very rare for people to turn up at their GP or their consultant armed with information about the options available to them. If doctors were to raise assisted suicide unprompted, it would mean the complete devastation of that relationship—it is not a neutral act. Jackie Baillie spoke about young people at length. In my heart, I just feel that I cannot imagine how there could be any trust between me and a healthcare practitioner if they brought that up with me unprompted. You must understand that challenge.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 18 November 2025

Sue Webber

I hope that the member might consider it somewhat ironic that, in earlier amendments, we were looking to collate data on side effects of these drugs and how patients interacted with them while carrying out their own deaths, and the challenge with the dissemination of such information was: when might it not be inappropriate?

We are talking here about public dissemination, not dissemination through the sorts of clinical channels that exist right now to allow people to move on with medical decisions and to share information. As I have said, this is more about attempting to follow the Online Safety Act 2023; after all, you do not find many clinicians sharing their medical practice on TikTok.

As for Pam Duncan-Glancy’s amendment on advertising, we will want to ensure that we prohibit the dissemination of information on services that are provided, as well as the substances, because you might start to get inappropriate advertisements in that respect. Indeed, one can envisage some of the gross and inappropriate advertising that might materialise if that is not prohibited. I am talking about both subtle and direct advertising, because marketing is extremely powerful. We see it all around us, including in the sort of influencing that you get on social media, and we really must do everything that we can to prohibit that sort of thing.

With that, I conclude my remarks.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 18 November 2025

Sue Webber

It is aimed at professionals who are involved in the medical and scientific field. I would say yes to your clarification: it is aimed at those who are seeking to—it is challenging for me to say this—make changes to the substances that are involved in assisted dying. My earlier amendments were about some of the substances’ challenging side effects and understanding how all the substances interact with various individuals—because, after all, we are all unique in how we interact with medicines.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 18 November 2025

Sue Webber

Yes, that subsection is there to allow the appropriate sharing of information—not for it to be shared in ways that might be deemed inappropriate and through which it could be used by the vulnerable individuals who I alluded to in my commentary.