The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2800 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Sue Webber
We have also heard how allowing committees to meet in private—or even not in private, but in formal session—at the same time as the chamber could increase committee capacity and reduce some of the congestion. Would the Government be in a position to support something like that? Do you have any thoughts on it? It might mean that you would have to appear at committees at all times of the day.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Sue Webber
One of our witnesses said, “What would happen if the committees just said no to something happening?” How would the Government feel if a committee was to exert that level of control?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Sue Webber
I am sorry—this is a question that I want to focus on, if that is okay.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Sue Webber
We should get them in.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Sue Webber
Perhaps it also depends on where the committee intends to go.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Sue Webber
Yes, I want to ask about culture. A lot of stuff has been covered, so I will not dwell on those aspects.
I want to unearth what members think some options might be for strengthening committees and for promoting a greater cross-party culture as a way of improving effectiveness.
We have heard already about all sorts of things, including elected conveners, better use of visits and engagements, and agreeing on a committee’s scrutiny priorities. Ms Adam spoke about having a lot of time for work programme discussions, which is something that, as a previous convener of the Education, Children and Young People Committee, I do not recognise. When you have legislation thrown at you from every angle, you do not have the opportunity to have a work programme discussion.
How do we create a real culture of working together within the confines that we have, and what might we be able to do? I ask Douglas Ross to respond first.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Sue Webber
Yes, indeed.
We have heard a lot from our various witnesses, specifically those who spoke to us earlier this morning, about how important cross-party working is for the effectiveness of committees. We also heard a little bit about how some witnesses felt that that had changed since the Green Party came out of the official arrangement with the current Government. How does cross-party working—or the lack of it, importantly—impact on government?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Sue Webber
Back to me—keep up!
We have heard a lot about preferences for a committee structure. Right now, the committees mirror many of the ministerial portfolios. Do you think that there could be a balance between committee remits having a manageable breadth of scope and further clarity being provided on which committee each minister is accountable to? There are currently ministers whose portfolios cross over the committee remits—I am thinking of Mr Fairlie, the Minister for Agriculture and Connectivity. In addition, some of the education and skills portfolio runs across a number of committees.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Sue Webber
I suspect that you might be called to any of the committees, with your remit.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Sue Webber
Are you talking about hearing from all the voices on all the sides?