The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3405 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Sue Webber
That is fair, because the pace of change in the world is galloping ahead in so many different ways, so we need to be able to shift the dial.
You have already mentioned that politics will come into the process. We have heard that the parliamentary sanctions and the grounds for recall have the potential to be politicised. Will you speak a little bit more about that?
We have heard that it might come down to the fact that a political party might take the view that if a candidate is not—I will use this phrase—towing the line or the party line, it would be beneficial for the party to try to encourage something to happen to that particular MSP. I am being a bit cynical, but I am sure that you understand where I am going with this line of questioning. How can we protect from that but at the same time make sure that the process allows the recall to commence in a stable, sensible manner, rather than in a knee-jerk political way?
09:15Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Sue Webber
In one of your responses earlier, you mentioned parity of process, “as much as we can achieve it”. There have been a lot of questions and concerns about the costs, specifically for the regional recall and poll, and the fact that those could be in excess of £2.5 million. Given the concerns about costs that you just outlined, would that be good value for the public purse, and what might the perception be of that cost?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Sue Webber
All the evidence that the committee has taken has stated that there would be a grace period when a councillor is elected as an MSP, to allow them to carry on in the former role for a period of a year, give or take. I would support that, and I want to clarify that that is where your head is going, too.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Sue Webber
That is what I am trying to explore—where is your exception?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Sue Webber
I understand, now, where you are going, and I accept that. I was confused.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Sue Webber
I have a small question.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Sue Webber
Okay.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Sue Webber
How far away?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Sue Webber
Good morning. The Scottish Government’s policy memorandum mentions that the legislation might need to be “future proofed”. Could you say a little bit more about your thought process as to what that might mean?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Sue Webber
Where is your thinking going on that?