The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3728 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 February 2026
Sue Webber
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. In his response to questioning from Russell Findlay, the First Minister made remarks in relation to a meeting of the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee on 27 January, when, apparently, the committee was presented with a code of conduct by the Minister for Agriculture and Connectivity, Jim Fairlie, in relation to bus passes.
However, the committee meeting in question was on 20 January. At that meeting, the minister took a unilateral decision to not share his code of conduct with the committee—nor did the minister press the motion on the Scottish statutory instrument before the committee. It was clear that the committee was not minded to support it.
It is the minister’s incompetence that has been at the very heart of the delay in introducing legislation to remove bus passes from those committing antisocial behaviour on buses.
Meeting of the Parliament [Last updated 18:59]
Meeting date: 12 February 2026
Sue Webber
Will the First Minister now take the opportunity to correct the record to reflect the reality of events?
Meeting of the Parliament [Last updated 18:59]
Meeting date: 12 February 2026
Sue Webber
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. In his response to questioning from Russell Findlay, the First Minister made remarks in relation to a meeting of the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee on 27 January, when, apparently, the committee was presented with a code of conduct by the Minister for Agriculture and Connectivity, Jim Fairlie, in relation to bus passes.
However, the committee meeting in question was on 20 January. At that meeting, the minister took a unilateral decision to not share his code of conduct with the committee—nor did the minister press the motion on the Scottish statutory instrument before the committee. It was clear that the committee was not minded to support it.
It is the minister’s incompetence that has been at the very heart of the delay in introducing legislation to remove bus passes from those committing antisocial behaviour on buses.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 February 2026
Sue Webber
Thank you, minister.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 February 2026
Sue Webber
As a postal voter who does not notice the difference when I get requests through for either election, I suspect that this will be a lot smoother than we are giving it credit for.
What assurances can you give that the transition will be smooth and that, given everything that is going on, Scottish voters will have their preferred absent voter arrangements in place should an unscheduled election be called?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 February 2026
Sue Webber
That is great. The voter experience will be smooth and seamless.
Meeting of the Parliament [Last updated 19:31]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Sue Webber
I struggled to hear most of that response, but I will do my best.
A Centre for Women’s Justice article, posted on its website, said:
“Many survivors describe how they truly believed they were going to die whilst they were being strangled. Some report such offending as taking place in full view of their children. Not being able to breathe is terrifying”.
The bringing in of a stand-alone offence in England and Wales has been welcomed by front-line organisations such as Women’s Aid and the Domestic Abuse Commissioner. Why are the Scottish victims still being left behind? What message does the minister think that it sends that victims here get less protection?
Meeting of the Parliament [Last updated 19:31]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Sue Webber
To ask the Scottish Government what progress it has made in the current parliamentary session on preventing gender-based violence in relation to non-fatal strangulation. (S6O-05471)
Meeting of the Parliament [Last updated 19:31]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Sue Webber
The proposed budget reduces the rail infrastructure improvement and rolling stock projects budget by 16.5 per cent. Will the cabinet secretary outline how that will impact the ability to procure new rolling stock and infrastructure improvements, particularly in relation to the procurement of new trains to replace ScotRail’s high-speed train fleet?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Sue Webber
I struggled to hear most of that response, but I will do my best.
A Centre for Women’s Justice article, posted on its website, said:
“Many survivors describe how they truly believed they were going to die whilst they were being strangled. Some report such offending as taking place in full view of their children. Not being able to breathe is terrifying”.
The bringing in of a stand-alone offence in England and Wales has been welcomed by front-line organisations such as Women’s Aid and the Domestic Abuse Commissioner. Why are the Scottish victims still being left behind? What message does the minister think that it sends that victims here get less protection?