Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 20 February 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3728 contributions

|

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

First Minister’s Question Time

Meeting date: 12 February 2026

Sue Webber

On a point of order, Presiding Officer. In his response to questioning from Russell Findlay, the First Minister made remarks in relation to a meeting of the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee on 27 January, when, apparently, the committee was presented with a code of conduct by the Minister for Agriculture and Connectivity, Jim Fairlie, in relation to bus passes.

However, the committee meeting in question was on 20 January. At that meeting, the minister took a unilateral decision to not share his code of conduct with the committee—nor did the minister press the motion on the Scottish statutory instrument before the committee. It was clear that the committee was not minded to support it.

It is the minister’s incompetence that has been at the very heart of the delay in introducing legislation to remove bus passes from those committing antisocial behaviour on buses.

Meeting of the Parliament [Last updated 18:59]

First Minister’s Question Time

Meeting date: 12 February 2026

Sue Webber

Will the First Minister now take the opportunity to correct the record to reflect the reality of events?

Meeting of the Parliament [Last updated 18:59]

First Minister’s Question Time

Meeting date: 12 February 2026

Sue Webber

On a point of order, Presiding Officer. In his response to questioning from Russell Findlay, the First Minister made remarks in relation to a meeting of the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee on 27 January, when, apparently, the committee was presented with a code of conduct by the Minister for Agriculture and Connectivity, Jim Fairlie, in relation to bus passes.

However, the committee meeting in question was on 20 January. At that meeting, the minister took a unilateral decision to not share his code of conduct with the committee—nor did the minister press the motion on the Scottish statutory instrument before the committee. It was clear that the committee was not minded to support it.

It is the minister’s incompetence that has been at the very heart of the delay in introducing legislation to remove bus passes from those committing antisocial behaviour on buses.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 February 2026

Sue Webber

Thank you, minister.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 February 2026

Sue Webber

As a postal voter who does not notice the difference when I get requests through for either election, I suspect that this will be a lot smoother than we are giving it credit for.

What assurances can you give that the transition will be smooth and that, given everything that is going on, Scottish voters will have their preferred absent voter arrangements in place should an unscheduled election be called?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 February 2026

Sue Webber

That is great. The voter experience will be smooth and seamless.

Meeting of the Parliament [Last updated 19:31]

General Question Time

Meeting date: 5 February 2026

Sue Webber

I struggled to hear most of that response, but I will do my best.

A Centre for Women’s Justice article, posted on its website, said:

“Many survivors describe how they truly believed they were going to die whilst they were being strangled. Some report such offending as taking place in full view of their children. Not being able to breathe is terrifying”.

The bringing in of a stand-alone offence in England and Wales has been welcomed by front-line organisations such as Women’s Aid and the Domestic Abuse Commissioner. Why are the Scottish victims still being left behind? What message does the minister think that it sends that victims here get less protection?

Meeting of the Parliament [Last updated 19:31]

General Question Time

Meeting date: 5 February 2026

Sue Webber

To ask the Scottish Government what progress it has made in the current parliamentary session on preventing gender-based violence in relation to non-fatal strangulation. (S6O-05471)

Meeting of the Parliament [Last updated 19:31]

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 5 February 2026

Sue Webber

The proposed budget reduces the rail infrastructure improvement and rolling stock projects budget by 16.5 per cent. Will the cabinet secretary outline how that will impact the ability to procure new rolling stock and infrastructure improvements, particularly in relation to the procurement of new trains to replace ScotRail’s high-speed train fleet?

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

General Question Time

Meeting date: 5 February 2026

Sue Webber

I struggled to hear most of that response, but I will do my best.

A Centre for Women’s Justice article, posted on its website, said:

“Many survivors describe how they truly believed they were going to die whilst they were being strangled. Some report such offending as taking place in full view of their children. Not being able to breathe is terrifying”.

The bringing in of a stand-alone offence in England and Wales has been welcomed by front-line organisations such as Women’s Aid and the Domestic Abuse Commissioner. Why are the Scottish victims still being left behind? What message does the minister think that it sends that victims here get less protection?