Skip to main content

Parliament dissolved ahead of election

The Scottish Parliament is now dissolved ahead of the election on Thursday 7 May 2026.

During dissolution, there are no MSPs and no parliamentary business can take place.

For more information, please visit Election 2026

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Session 6: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3800 contributions

|

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 24 March 2022

Sue Webber

To ask the Scottish Government whether it is adapting its agriculture policy for crops and livestock due to the war in Ukraine. (S6O-00917)

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 24 March 2022

Sue Webber

The war in Ukraine has highlighted the need to support our farmers and growers to deal with crises such as inflationary pressure and the market volatility that they face. Will the cabinet secretary promise that her Government will not approve any more deals to send thousands of sweet potatoes to Russia?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Alternative Pathways to Primary Care

Meeting date: 22 March 2022

Sue Webber

You mentioned self-referral, rather than everyone having to phone the GP practice and speak to the receptionist.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Alternative Pathways to Primary Care

Meeting date: 22 March 2022

Sue Webber

Thanks, convener. I hope that you can see me this time. My signal is a bit more stable now.

The Royal College of Nursing has rightly pointed out that people with poor health literacy are less able to identify or label what is wrong with them, and are therefore less able to identify and self-refer to the various alternative pathways that we hear so much about. What is your assessment of the risk that an increase in use of digital pathways will increase the health inequalities that many people face?

Adam Stachura mentioned the scale of the issue, given the number of over-60s who do not have a device, and Chris Mackie said that digital should always be a meaningful choice, so maybe they are interested in responding.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Alternative Pathways to Primary Care

Meeting date: 22 March 2022

Sue Webber

In 2019, the Health and Sport Committee held an inquiry that highlighted a number of barriers relating to health practitioners’ use of—[Inaudible.]—in primary care. Such barriers included a lack of strong evidence on its long-term effectiveness, time constraints, lack of awareness and quality assurance. Has any progress been made in tackling those barriers over the past three years? Perhaps Alison Leitch can start on that.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Alternative Pathways to Primary Care

Meeting date: 22 March 2022

Sue Webber

In 2017, the Scottish Government published a “Making it Easier: A Health Literacy Action Plan for Scotland 2017-2025”. In the five years since, what progress has been made in improving health literacy? What sense do you get that there has been improvement? Do you think that the plan has contributed to progress? I am not sure whether Chris Mackie is able to answer.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Alternative Pathways to Primary Care

Meeting date: 22 March 2022

Sue Webber

It looks like a couple of people—Scott Henderson and Paul Perry, perhaps—might want to respond to my question.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Alternative Pathways to Primary Care

Meeting date: 22 March 2022

Sue Webber

You alluded to link workers reporting that there is a lack of understanding of their role—[Inaudible.]—which impedes progress on social prescribing. You also mentioned some successes. What progress has been made on raising awareness of the role and on making it a much more viable route for care and support?

The point of contact still seems to be the GP practice, and we hear a lot of frustration from people who are struggling to get past the receptionist. It seems that everyone is still having to come in to the GP practice to get a referral. It was interesting to hear from Clare Cook earlier about some of the self-referral pathways. What are we doing to address the lack of understanding?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Alternative Pathways to Primary Care

Meeting date: 22 March 2022

Sue Webber

In 2019, when the Health and Sport Committee was taking evidence—I was not on the committee at the time—it heard about a number of barriers that healthcare practitioners faced in relation to their use of social prescribing. Those barriers included a lack of strong evidence on its long-term effectiveness, time constraints, lack of awareness and quality assurance, or how they could be assured of consistency in quality. Linked to that is the issue of continuous monitoring of whether services are still available in the community, because we know how transient some organisations can be due to lack of funding. Has any progress been made in tackling those barriers in the past three years?

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)

Complex Care (Out-of-area Placements and Delayed Discharge)

Meeting date: 22 March 2022

Sue Webber

The minister’s statement rightly points out that improved data is needed to quantify and measure work to improve people’s lives—especially people with complex needs who are lost and tied up in hospital. The register will make some progress towards that, but it is concerning that work has not already been undertaken to join up support and care for vulnerable individuals.

Of the people whose release from hospital was delayed by three days or more in December, a quarter were people with complex needs and learning disabilities. Is there a case for expedited progress and real action, rather than more promises? Such promises have noble ambitions, but no instinct for delivery.