The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3728 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Sue Webber
I accept the premise that local decision making is a priority, but we are facing congestion at Sheriffhall that is frustrating for drivers and is holding back the economy of the Lothians and, frankly, all of south-east Scotland by making transport for businesses slower and far less reliable. Why has it taken two years for ministers to even consider the outcome of the public inquiry, which was submitted back in October 2023? When will the decision be made that we will get our Sheriffhall roundabout?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
Sue Webber
They do not have to do it.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
Sue Webber
Yes, definitely. Thank you, minister. That is all from me.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
Sue Webber
I recognise what Ruth Maguire said, but I am reading the letters from both conveners and I still think that the two groups should be one CPG. The letters mention how they work together and do everything collaboratively, so, to me, it should be one CPG. I am not sure how the rest of the committee feels. It is a good example, as Ruth Maguire has just pointed out, but duplication on the topic is happening everywhere.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
Sue Webber
The convener has already touched on this, slightly.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
Sue Webber
Your remarks might be seen as a warning shot. It is partly due to where we are in the parliamentary session that the CPGs are being permitted to carry on as individual CPGs. Perhaps you could be a bit firmer in your communications.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
Sue Webber
A tiny bit.
You mentioned the importance of young people and looked-after young people specifically. We heard from the Electoral Commission that there was going to be
“a round-table ... with organisations that work with care-experienced young people to explain to them the changes”—[Official Report, Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee, 4 September 2025; c.14]
and what that meant for them. What work does the Scottish Government have planned, in conjunction with the Electoral Commission or other organisations, to ensure that looked-after young people or those formally looked after and aged under 21 are aware of the declaration of local connection change with regard to their ability to exercise their right to vote?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
Sue Webber
In a data-driven world, the commission will be best placed to reflect on the success of the change.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
Sue Webber
I agree.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
Sue Webber
I agree. As convener of that committee, I was fortunate that we had only one commissioner reporting to us, making it easier to programme that in. I know that having many commissioners would make that even harder to do. As I said, the lack of accountability cannot be right and is just another reason why the current landscape is not working well.
There has been much food for thought throughout this welcome debate, including about how well Parliament operates when disbursing public money. In order for us to take stock and think carefully about the way forward so that we can provide a more coherent and effective structure, we want a dedicated, short-term committee examining the options and a moratorium being put in place on any new commissioners while it does so.
Again, I thank Mr Macpherson and his committee for their work.
16:26