Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 24 February 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3728 contributions

|

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 24 September 2025

Sue Webber

I accept the premise that local decision making is a priority, but we are facing congestion at Sheriffhall that is frustrating for drivers and is holding back the economy of the Lothians and, frankly, all of south-east Scotland by making transport for businesses slower and far less reliable. Why has it taken two years for ministers to even consider the outcome of the public inquiry, which was submitted back in October 2023? When will the decision be made that we will get our Sheriffhall roundabout?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 18 September 2025

Sue Webber

They do not have to do it.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 18 September 2025

Sue Webber

Yes, definitely. Thank you, minister. That is all from me.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Cross-Party Group

Meeting date: 18 September 2025

Sue Webber

I recognise what Ruth Maguire said, but I am reading the letters from both conveners and I still think that the two groups should be one CPG. The letters mention how they work together and do everything collaboratively, so, to me, it should be one CPG. I am not sure how the rest of the committee feels. It is a good example, as Ruth Maguire has just pointed out, but duplication on the topic is happening everywhere.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 18 September 2025

Sue Webber

The convener has already touched on this, slightly.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Cross-Party Group

Meeting date: 18 September 2025

Sue Webber

Your remarks might be seen as a warning shot. It is partly due to where we are in the parliamentary session that the CPGs are being permitted to carry on as individual CPGs. Perhaps you could be a bit firmer in your communications.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 18 September 2025

Sue Webber

A tiny bit.

You mentioned the importance of young people and looked-after young people specifically. We heard from the Electoral Commission that there was going to be

“a round-table ... with organisations that work with care-experienced young people to explain to them the changes”—[Official Report, Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee, 4 September 2025; c.14]

and what that meant for them. What work does the Scottish Government have planned, in conjunction with the Electoral Commission or other organisations, to ensure that looked-after young people or those formally looked after and aged under 21 are aware of the declaration of local connection change with regard to their ability to exercise their right to vote?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 18 September 2025

Sue Webber

In a data-driven world, the commission will be best placed to reflect on the success of the change.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Cross-Party Group

Meeting date: 18 September 2025

Sue Webber

I agree.

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 18 September 2025

Sue Webber

I agree. As convener of that committee, I was fortunate that we had only one commissioner reporting to us, making it easier to programme that in. I know that having many commissioners would make that even harder to do. As I said, the lack of accountability cannot be right and is just another reason why the current landscape is not working well.

There has been much food for thought throughout this welcome debate, including about how well Parliament operates when disbursing public money. In order for us to take stock and think carefully about the way forward so that we can provide a more coherent and effective structure, we want a dedicated, short-term committee examining the options and a moratorium being put in place on any new commissioners while it does so.

Again, I thank Mr Macpherson and his committee for their work.

16:26