The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2987 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Sue Webber
I have some questions about your general functions under the bill. Why do you consider it necessary to have a statutory power to require individuals to provide information when it is necessary for the commissioner to perform its statutory functions, such as issuing practice recommendations and handling applications for review?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Sue Webber
Please do not apologise, convener. Thank you for making me look more on the ball this morning. [Laughter.]
Let us have a look at failure to comply with notices. Section 14 of the bill amends section 53 of the 2002 act to make it explicit that failure by a public authority to comply with the timescale specified in a decision notice can result in referral to the Court of Session for enforcement. Do you have any examples or evidence of how late compliance with decision notices has caused inconvenience or resulted in unnecessary expenditure for your office?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Sue Webber
That is helpful.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Sue Webber
That would be interesting, because we got a very strong yes from our previous panel on whether those two groups should be included in the legislation.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Sue Webber
Yes, I understand that.
On the codes of practice under FOISA, the enforceability and how effective that would be given the status of the law, why do you consider the proposal in the bill to be problematic within the current freedom of information framework? If the proposals on enforcement notices were introduced, what form of parliamentary oversight would be necessary to ensure accountability?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Sue Webber
That is good.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Sue Webber
How long does it take you to work on one? We have heard some challenges about progress, and the pace at which things seem to move has been classed as “glacial”. I wonder how you respond to that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Sue Webber
An advanced stage.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Sue Webber
Perhaps you could provide us with some timelines, just for assurance and so that we get a sense that there is progress. There is an appetite for the process to be modernised and brought up to date, but not everything is changing at the pace that the public and members might want to see, so we are looking for a bit of assurance.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Sue Webber
I understand that, minister. I know you well.