The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2800 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Sue Webber
I like the term “casual vacancies”—I am enjoying that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Sue Webber
We will come to questions on vacancies. Annabel Mullin, do you want to come in? I cannot remember what my original question was.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Sue Webber
As our evidence has shown, we are all aware that we have to accept that there is quite a difference in how we are elected as regional and constituency MSPs and, therefore, accept that how we progress in those circumstances will also be different.
The committee has received a lot of evidence that the cost of running the recall process for a regional MSP could be about £2.5 million. Is that cost justifiable, based on the additional accountability that the recall process is intended to deliver? What is the cost benefit analysis? You have already mentioned that there are seven other elected representatives for those individuals. I will come to you first, Juliet, because I have caught your eye.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Sue Webber
I think that it is for the recall process—
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Sue Webber
Yes, it is for both.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Sue Webber
You said that there were a number of resignations before by-elections were triggered. Do you think that the process acts as a deterrent? You know what I mean when I say “deterrent”. It is almost a cost containment mechanism—the member knows that the game is up, to be blunt.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Sue Webber
Would the recall process that is proposed in the bill do a good job of balancing different considerations around the equal treatment of regional and constituency MSPs, considering how they are initially elected.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Sue Webber
Juliet, the previous panel mentioned that it could be seen as a stitch-up if the seat just went to the next person on the regional list. Those are their words and not mine. You spoke at the outset about transparency for politicians in general. What are your thoughts about that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Sue Webber
That is a warning for us, then.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Sue Webber
Is even considering taking the next person on the list perhaps a bit of a lazy way to find a solution? Lazy might not be the right word; it is the easiest way.