Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 21 October 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2863 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Cross-Party Group

Meeting date: 18 September 2025

Sue Webber

I agree.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 18 September 2025

Sue Webber

The convener has already touched on this, slightly.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Cross-Party Group

Meeting date: 18 September 2025

Sue Webber

Your remarks might be seen as a warning shot. It is partly due to where we are in the parliamentary session that the CPGs are being permitted to carry on as individual CPGs. Perhaps you could be a bit firmer in your communications.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 18 September 2025

Sue Webber

They do not have to do it.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 18 September 2025

Sue Webber

Yes, definitely. Thank you, minister. That is all from me.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Cross-Party Group

Meeting date: 18 September 2025

Sue Webber

I recognise what Ruth Maguire said, but I am reading the letters from both conveners and I still think that the two groups should be one CPG. The letters mention how they work together and do everything collaboratively, so, to me, it should be one CPG. I am not sure how the rest of the committee feels. It is a good example, as Ruth Maguire has just pointed out, but duplication on the topic is happening everywhere.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 September 2025

Sue Webber

Mr Highcock, the EMB has raised concerns about the proposal to reduce the period of dissolution from 28 to 20 working days. You said:

“in the view of the EMB, this would be an unacceptable change which would place the delivery of elections at severe risk … To limit the timetable to 20 days would leave insufficient time for postal ballot papers to be produced, dispatched and returned.”

Have there been any discussions between you and the Government since May 2024 that have reduced some of the concerns that you set out previously?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 September 2025

Sue Webber

Therefore, are you confident that the issues with the postal ballots have been resolved and that there are suitable measures in place?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 September 2025

Sue Webber

That is great. My next questions were around the implications that we should be aware of in relation to MSP candidacy. I would probably ask for more information and more detail on that, because, as somebody who would be both an MSP and a candidate, I can say that that is complicated enough at the best of times. How easy would it be for us to grapple with that? Is there anything that the committee needs to reinforce for the future?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Cross-Party Groups

Meeting date: 26 June 2025

Sue Webber

If the CPG on deafness was to include visual impairment, there might be an obligation on the organisations that attend the CPG on visual impairment—such as the Guide Dogs for the Blind Association and the Royal National Institute of Blind People—to attend the other CPG as well, and it might also put more pressure on small charities and people who are interested. I know that the CPG on visual impairment is doing some specific work with Stuart McMillan, its convener, which I have been involved in through my work on floating bus stops. We are aware of their impact on deaf people and people with visual impairments.

I am really concerned by the prospect of expansion, and I recommend being a bit more firm, convener.