The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2987 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sue Webber
I get what you are saying. It is the double negative.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sue Webber
Alex, can you help us with that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sue Webber
I think that the Scottish Information Commissioner suggested that it might be used tactically to delay responses.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sue Webber
So, do you think that the pause-the-clock mechanism will have a positive or negative effect on the workload of FOI officers?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sue Webber
You talked earlier about one of the frustrations for those making FOI requests being timeliness, but the committee has also had some evidence that requesters might view clarification requests with suspicion. The whole world is in that sort of place right now. Could the pause mechanism proposed in the bill reduce that perception or perhaps make it worse? Are there any other legal or procedural changes that would better support improvements to trust and transparency?
Ben Worthy, I was told to come to you first on that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sue Webber
Is there a risk to public trust if public authorities are not sufficiently resourced to meet the 20-working-day deadline?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sue Webber
How does the proposed presumption in favour of disclosure compare with the situation in other jurisdictions and their FOI legislation?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sue Webber
I think that Ben is thinking, too.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sue Webber
If no one else wants to comment, I will hand back to the convener.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sue Webber
What are your thoughts on some of the alternative proposals such as having a shorter time limit—five working days for seeking clarification—after which only a pause would apply? Would that balance the needs of requesters with the operational realities of public authorities?