Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 12 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2987 contributions

|

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Sue Webber

I am not aware of the specifics that you have raised, Mr FitzPatrick, but why not put it into the bill? We are doing something that is really challenging for many people around the table, and the bill might pass at stage 3. I want every safeguard in place, and I want full consent to be given by anyone who considers ending their life. We must ensure that that is the case, and it is our obligation to do that.

If the bill passes, we cannot allow people to walk into the process blind. Amendment 158 is about damage limitation. It is completely about ensuring that 100 per cent informed consent is given. It is a safeguard against ignorance and a reminder that, even when we legislate for death, the Parliament still bears responsibility for life.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 6 November 2025

Sue Webber

“Give the best answer the first time around”—we will take that out of that reponse.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 6 November 2025

Sue Webber

Okay. Does anyone else want to comment?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 6 November 2025

Sue Webber

If the proposed amendment to the general entitlement does not alter the position of disclosure under the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002, how might it still help to shift organisational culture or public perception around transparency?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 6 November 2025

Sue Webber

I am struggling to hear you, Alex. You are going in and out. I will ask Juliet Swann that question, which I hope you can pick up.

Public authorities say that they already operate with that presumption of disclosure and are open and transparent. Why, then, do users of FOISA often feel that exemptions are used as a default in order to withhold information?

10:45  

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 6 November 2025

Sue Webber

You do not think that they would be viewed as delaying tactics or with suspicion by the requester.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 6 November 2025

Sue Webber

Juliet Swann, would the proposed pause improve the experience of users of the 2002 act and strengthen trust in the system?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 6 November 2025

Sue Webber

Some of the evidence that was submitted to the committee suggested that the clock approach can feel adversarial to requesters. Would a pause mechanism lead to a better relationship between public authorities and the public?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 6 November 2025

Sue Webber

Some of the respondents to the committee’s call for views suggested that the proposal will not change the legal position of information that is disclosed under the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002, while others warned that it could downgrade the existing position. Do you consider that some of the amendments are necessary, or could they be perceived as merely symbolic?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 6 November 2025

Sue Webber

I was looking straight at Professor Dunion. [Laughter.]