The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2800 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Sue Webber
Willie, do you have any thoughts?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Sue Webber
What about lessons learned from the Westminster process, Professor Clark?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Sue Webber
That is helpful. When the member in charge of the bill answers questions, we can ask him that, but that is not a question for today.
Does either of the other witnesses want to comment on other criteria that could be added and/or thresholds that need to be considered?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Sue Webber
I accept that. I am happy with those answers, convener.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Sue Webber
Annabel, you are nodding.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Sue Webber
On that point, regional representatives, which many of us are, are elected in quite a different way, and we accept that—well, we should accept it, frankly. In that case, is it fair enough to have different mechanisms for recall for regional and first-past-the-post seats?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Sue Webber
There is no need to apologise—I accept it. [Laughter.]
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Sue Webber
That goes back to the convener’s point about the purpose of the bill.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Sue Webber
I know that we have covered a bit of this in some of the discussion already. You have spoken about how the recall process works in other countries. The bill that Graham Simpson is introducing broadly seeks to replicate the principles and design of the Recall of MPs Act 2015. Does the experience to date of how that act has worked in practice suggest that it is a good approach? Dr Stanford, you said that there had been only four by-elections and six petitions. I will come straight to you, if that is okay.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Sue Webber
That is okay—I get that.
Dr Stanford, you said in your written submission that triggering the recall process could be
“open to abuse by what can be considered a ‘good reason’ for an absence. Such a move would need considerable safeguards to protect against highly concentrated pressure groups with vested interests”.
We all feel that on a regular basis; it seems to be how the world is working right now.
Dr Clark has already said a wee bit about the thresholds, but are the proposed criteria for triggering the recall process appropriate? Should other criteria be set to balance it all out?
I put that to you first, Dr Stanford.