The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1811 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
Do you have confidence in the process for identifying a problem and for identifying and piloting a solution? That would take longer than just biting the bullet and saying that something is going to happen.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
Thank you. Alice, did you want to come in on notional spend?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
We resume our evidence taking on the Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Bill at stage 1 with our second panel of witnesses. Professor Alistair Clark is from Newcastle University, and Professor Toby James is from the University of East Anglia. I welcome you both to this evidence session.
Rather than look at specific provisions in the bill, I will kick off by asking for your thoughts on the integrity of Scotland’s devolved elections, which the bill obviously relates to. Is Scotland a good example around the world? Alistair Clark, do you want to kick off on that?
10:15Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
Thank you for that, Kay. Hannah, what would you like to see as the priorities?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
Thank you, Hannah. This is almost becoming a shopping list. Ahlam, what do you think the priorities should be for funding to increase democratic access?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
Just before Jackie moves on to her next question, I want to ask Hannah what she would like to be in the bill. You referred to the Jo Cox Foundation’s recommendations, which the committee is aware of, and you highlighted the one on guidance, which could be progressed without the bill. Are you looking for anything specifically in the bill, or would you like—I will use a phrase that will come back to haunt me—a declaration in the bill of an intention to introduce other legislation, such as statutory instruments, to bring in the guidance? Would that go some way to reassuring you that the intention to have the environment that I think we all want can be achieved without specific calls for that in the primary legislation?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
I am certainly content that you fulfilled your responsibility, Jackie. I return to you, Edward.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
James Adams, on a slightly different point in the evidence, my understanding is that you would like to ensure that electronic polling cards could be brought in in the future. Is there a reason why we should not bring in electronic polling cards, along with physical polling cards, at the moment? What would be the advantages of electronic polling cards?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
Therefore, at the very least, it is a good proposal for a pilot.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Martin Whitfield
I apologise, but I just want to come in on the previous point. You say that there is not much research on digital imprints, but in other democracies—I am thinking of the US—the requirement for a candidate to affirm a message that is put out to the public has existed for a lot longer. Is there research in the US on the effect of that endorsement? Are you aware of any effect? If so, is it good or bad?