The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2357 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
In essence, then, what we need to underpin freedom of information is transparency in that decision-making process, to ensure that there can be understanding. It does not matter what the appropriate body is as long as that process takes place and can be interrogated.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Please do.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Before I bring in Katy Clark, I want to ask about the proposal to extend the offence of altering or destroying records. Such things frequently come to light because someone has made a freedom of information request. Do you see any challenges there? Do you see value in extending that in cases where no freedom of information request has been made and the destruction of the records has come into public knowledge in a completely different way? Is there anything that we need to be cautious about in introducing a blanket extension of the provisions?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Therefore, what is required is the next supportive step to move from compliance—“I will comply because I have to, and I will comply absolutely”—towards an environment in which people better understand both the importance and, in a sense, the ownership of the information.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Oh, I am sorry.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
I see that there are no other questions from members, but I would like to pick up on your previous point, minister. The situation is that, in effect, the archive of signatures is potentially five years old; you have identified the two demographic groups where there is most likely to be a change; and you have said that a risk has been identified in that respect.
I have two questions. First, can you illuminate us further on any discussions that you have had about how that risk will be reduced, particularly with regard to younger people? As you have said, we will be talking about a small group of voters, but they might be as old as 21 now, if they applied when they were 16. I note that the Government has issued the normal United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child compatibility statement, but what is your confidence that that statement is correct, given the risk that you have already expressed?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Are you confident that, even if it does not quite cover all the previous recommendations, the bill will move us substantially forward? Will it allow us to catch up, if not catch up completely?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Does any member wish to contribute to the debate?
Minister, do you wish to add anything?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
As no one wishes to add anything, the question is, that motion S6M-19488 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
We return with our second panel of witnesses. I welcome Alex Parsons, who is joining us online. He is a senior researcher at mySociety and WhatDoTheyKnow. We are joined in the room by Juliet Swann, who is the nations and regions programme manager for Transparency International UK.
We will move straight to questions if that is all right. Using the privilege of being convener, I will kick off with a question that I started with during the first panel. We consider the freedom of information provisions in Scotland to be well used and well regarded, but is that correct? Are we as good as we think we are?