The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2089 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
So, you are seeking the authority through the SSI to amend or redefine the statement in the 1998 act that there needs to be “provision for the payment”?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
Sorry, I realise that it will not change the mechanism. What I am concerned about is the ambiguity in wording. One provision places a duty to pay and the other is, in effect, placing a duty not to pay, by deduction.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
So, the Scottish Government is confident that the authority to make provision for payments will prevent an accusation against the corporate body that it is failing to meet the 1998 act because it is not making such provision.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
Did you consider the challenge that, although ennoblement occurs when it occurs in the House of Lords, the individual will be aware that ennoblement is coming, and, funnily enough, they actually have a huge amount of control over when it happens? Did that form any part of your concerns or, to go back to the policy behind the measure, are you satisfied that it is existing members of the House of Lords that you are talking about when it comes to dual mandates, rather than someone who is anticipating becoming a member?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is very helpful. It goes back to the policy decision that being an MSP is a full-time job and the public expectation is that the member has a full-time commitment to it and nothing else to detract from it. That underlies the practical decisions that are having to be taken in the SSIs.
Thank you for your patience, Graham.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
Excellent. Thank you.
Our next agenda items are the debates on the three pieces of subordinate legislation that are before us. The first is on motion S6M-18743.
As members will be aware, only the minister and members can speak during any debate on the motion. I invite the minister to move the motion.
Motion moved,
That the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee recommends that the Scottish Parliament (Disqualification of Members of the House of Commons) Regulations 2025 be approved.—[Graeme Dey]
Motion agreed to.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
The next item is a discussion of motion S6M-18744. I invite the minister to move the motion.
Motion moved,
That the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee recommends that the Scottish Parliament (Disqualification of Members of the House of Lords) Regulations 2025 be approved.—[Graeme Dey]
Motion agreed to.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
The next item is a debate on motion S6M-18745. I invite the minister to move the motion.
Motion moved,
That the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee recommends that the Scottish Parliament (Disqualification of Councillors) Regulations 2025 be approved.—[Graeme Dey]
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
Again, for the purpose of clarification, given that the Scottish Parliament rightly and understandably has no control over the salaries of members of Parliament, it was decided to take the same approach with the three statutory instruments, which relate to two elected roles and one unelected role, because it is easier and more pragmatic to make the deduction from the MSP salary. Control over that can be provided, and the practicalities of implementing that can then be dealt with. Is that right?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
The one outstanding period of time relates to councillors. The longer exception in that regard is a response to an understandable concern about multiple by-elections occurring following a Holyrood election. However, 372 days is a considerable period of overlap. Did that form any part in the consideration of whether there should be a dual salary for a period? If not quite two full-time jobs, there is one plus an almost full-time job to take account of, so someone is effectively being required to hold down two jobs, but with a penalty to their salary. Was that part of the consideration in either coming up with the 372 days or just saying that the burden of multiple by-elections outweighs the benefit of looking at anything less than that?