The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1811 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
You have raised the issue of turnout at by-elections, which is somewhere between 32 and 45 per cent, depending on the circumstances. They are very small turnouts, compared to full elections, and yet the level of 10 per cent triggers a by-election. Is there merit in looking at the connection between the figures, or should we look separately at the policy decision on the level of 10 per cent and the reality of the enthusiasm or otherwise for by-elections?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
Yes, it is a policy decision. That is helpful.
Another issue that I have picked up concerns the indicators that could prompt the recall process. Do we need to be careful in that regard, and to recognise the difference between what are potentially political decisions to seek to oust an MSP and a more moral agreed understanding? For example, removal following imprisonment for the period of a year already exists; there are measures to identify that.
What is the tension between the internal Scottish Parliament consequences that could lead to the process being activated and the external ones? What level of care do we need to put in place if we are going to pull our internal behaviour into an external result?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
Should we consider that aspect as part of the bill or, if the bill becomes law, should it be considered internally by the Parliament with regard to its procedures?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
Following on from that, I would say that another aspect of this is the money that is spent. With some of the petitions that make it to Westminster, parties have put enormous resource into ensuring that the 10 per cent threshold is reached. Do we need to take that issue into account? Obviously, that might not be dealt with in primary legislation, but there is a question about how much money is thrown at recalls. In some of the examples that you have shared from the US, those who backed petitions with a high level of resource achieved changes that might not otherwise have occurred. What level of credit, credence and thought should we give to that issue at this stage?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
So, make it a separation at that point.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
Is that a comment about your bill or about this committee? In any case, I am more than happy to take the flavour of the witnesses’ views.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
Are there any other comments?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is very helpful. As always, it is the detail that causes the problem.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
Do you have any concerns, or see any potential problems, with the conflict between the methodology in the bill, which is effectively direct, and the representative element? Should we be concerned enough to say that we should never let the two mix, or are you confident that there is scope for both in proportion?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
It is not a dynamic that we are used to in our democracy.