Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 23 October 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1891 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

I am grateful for that confirmation.

Before we move on to agenda item 4, I formally thank the minister and his officials, particularly Ian Thomson, for attending the meeting and giving evidence.

I request that the minister stay for agenda item 4, which is the formal part of our proceedings. I invite the minister to move motion S6M-01125.

Motion moved,

That the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee recommends that the Model Code of Conduct for Members of Devolved Public Bodies be approved.—[Tom Arthur]

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

Let us pause for a moment. I think that you might be looking at the wrong part of the wrong document. That is a different part.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

That would be helpful, Tom. If you and those who answer to you are unable to ascertain why that figure has been identified, it would be interesting to hear that as well.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

Under item 3 the committee will take evidence on subordinate legislation. I welcome Tom Arthur, Minister for Public Finance, Planning and Community Wealth, and his officials John St Clair and Ian Thomson, who join us remotely. I invite the minister to make an opening statement.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

The code relates specifically to members of public bodies. You talked about the code of conduct for councillors. I will express my point as a concern. Surely there is no need to have identical codes for councillors and members of public bodies because the institutions and responsibilities are different. Are you confident that the code for members of public bodies reflects the unique nature of the bodies on which they serve and to which they answer, rather than just repeating the councillors’ code and retitling it?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

The question is, that motion S6M-01125 be agreed to. Are we agreed?

Members: No.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

The point is noted. I call Bob Doris.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

Tess White has a few questions. If they are not for you to answer, Tom, please call on John St Clair or Ian Thomson as necessary.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

Edward, do you have a comment on that?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

Thank you for that, minister. Before I come to the first set of questions, I remind everyone that the microphones are operated by broadcasting, so we do not need to press any buttons or ensure that anything is on. It will all be taken care of. I will also indicate who is going to speak to ensure that broadcasting knows who is next.

Once again, I thank Tom Arthur for his short introductory remarks. A couple of questions arise from them, and I will take them in reverse order from the way in which they had originally been laid out.

The code has been around for a while. Why was it felt that amendments were needed at this stage and not earlier or later? Does this form part of a rolling programme of regular reviews of the code?