The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1492 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Martin Whitfield
What do you see as being the strategy and policy statement’s potential impact on devolved elections?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Martin Whitfield
Are you reassured that you have a road map to ensure that an election bill would be enacted before the next expected devolved election in 2026?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Martin Whitfield
I am grateful for that. My penultimate question relates to the letter that we have received from the UK Government, which again goes to the heart of the commission’s independence. The Minister for Equalities was unable to attend this meeting in person—I understand that there was a diary clash. Her letter says:
“To improve the parliamentary accountability of the Electoral Commission, the Bill makes provision for a Strategy and Policy Statement”—
which we have just discussed—
“that will set out guidance and principles, which the Commission will have to have regard to in the discharge of its functions.”
There are significant assertions in the UK Government’s evidence about the importance of the Electoral Commission’s independence, but I have concern about the phrase “will have”. Its use means that the strategy and policy statement will bind the commission; therefore, the matter of its independence is pertinent to today’s scrutiny. What are your comments on that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Martin Whitfield
Agenda item 2 is another decision on taking business in private. Does the committee agree that its consideration of complaint reports from the Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland will be taken in private at future meetings?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Martin Whitfield
Bob Doris also asked about ensuring that the very minimum expectations—I am choosing my words carefully here—apply across the whole of Scotland to ensure that we do not have, in essence, a constituency lottery.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Martin Whitfield
As we mentioned digital imprints only a few moments ago, I will pass over to Paul McLennan, who has some questions on that issue. I think that there are follow-up questions on that as well.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Martin Whitfield
I am grateful. The committee does not endorse YouTube. We are not reflecting on that—that was from the minister.
Edward Mountain will now deal with postal, proxy and overseas voting changes.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Martin Whitfield
I will ask about accessibility to polls. In the LCM, the Scottish Government states that it
“agrees that there is a need to improve the law in this area and intends to make a full assessment of possible improvements for devolved elections in order to bring forward its own changes”
for the forthcoming one.
We have had evidence about tactile voting devices. Many people, when they read about those on paper, imagine something terribly sophisticated when, in fact, they are not. However, they are also not particularly successful. I am not trying to force anything into the consultation and certainly not trying to dictate anything, but will you ensure that the range of people and groups that you consult will be broad enough to address the full challenges that disabled users face going into a polling station?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Martin Whitfield
I am very grateful for that. I think that Bob Doris wants to ask a question.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Martin Whitfield
We can.