The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1808 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
And the unknown unknowns.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Absolutely.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
What is the Government’s view on the fact that, if someone walks through the door to sign the petition, everyone will know what their position is? Does the Government have any concern that there would be no anonymity in that decision, whereas there is anonymity when someone steps into a polling booth?
09:30Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Absolutely—what if there is one sitting on top of that? That is why I ask the question of the Government.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
The expenditure on a petition might or might not be an election expense, irrespective of when it happens. If it falls within certain periods and it is such an expense, it will cause problems. I am inviting the Scottish Government to consider the issue in a bit more detail, because it potentially ties into whether a petition—if it becomes an uncontrollable event—is the right vehicle to do that first part.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Thankfully, it is not the committee members who are giving evidence today.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Let me say “situation” rather than “responsibility”.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
I will leave that there.
I turn to the Scottish Government’s point of view on another piece of evidence. The situation for councillors relates to the failure to attend a specific event that tends to be held monthly, but the bill talks about a period of time. Is the Scottish Government concerned that there is a fundamental difference between the requirement of a councillor to attend full council meetings and the requirement in the bill, which is just to attend physically?
You have expressed a view about physical attendance, and we have heard views in the committee and in evidence that it is actually really easy just to come and swipe in. However, we do not have a registration rule in the Parliament. People who have voted can be identified, and I understand that there are often freedom of information requests about who was in the chamber—we can always look at the television. However, is the Government concerned that identifying attendance in the Parliament is very different to identifying whether councillors have attended a specific meeting that falls at various times, with times in between?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
I again welcome Graham Simpson, given his interest in the matter, and I will be more than happy to bring him in at the appropriate time, if he has questions.
I will kick off. Minister, you said that you had 77 responses. I will not go into the split between individual and group responses, because I do not think that the responses have been published yet, so we have only headline figures. Were you satisfied with the level of response?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Let me put my question differently. Are you satisfied with the range of responses? Will they allow you to take your thinking forward with confidence about the view that is out there?