Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 10 November 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1235 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 4 November 2022

Sharon Dowey

Good morning, First Minister. I want to go back to the announcement of the preferred bidder. Can you tell us why you personally announced FMEL as the preferred bidder for the contract and whether that is something that you would normally do?

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 4 November 2022

Sharon Dowey

Did you instigate that, or did somebody—a transport official, a minister or a cabinet secretary—come to you?

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 4 November 2022

Sharon Dowey

Morag McNeill from CMAL said that it became aware on 21 August 2015 that FMEL could not provide a guarantee and that the preferred option was to go back to the tendering process. She said that, at the CMAL board meeting on 25 August,

“Transport Scotland was clear that the announcement was going ahead.”

When asked whether CMAL was happy to go forward, she said:

“Our preference was to retender. We were authorised by our shareholder to proceed. That was an instruction to proceed.”—[Official Report, Public Audit Committee, 30 June 2022; c 13, 5.]

Was there an interest from the Scottish Government to award the contract to FMEL? Was it a kind of jobs for the boys situation? There has been talk of the relationship between the Scottish Government and Jim McColl. Was there an interest from the Scottish Government to award the contract?

Public Audit Committee

Scottish Government Relationships with Public Bodies (Progress Review)

Meeting date: 6 October 2022

Sharon Dowey

So they are all fully aware of what help and support is available.

Public Audit Committee

Scottish Government Relationships with Public Bodies (Progress Review)

Meeting date: 6 October 2022

Sharon Dowey

You said that there has been an uplift in staff. Are you fully manned in that area? Do you have the two team leaders in place?

Public Audit Committee

Scottish Government Relationships with Public Bodies (Progress Review)

Meeting date: 6 October 2022

Sharon Dowey

For how long have the team leaders been in position?

Public Audit Committee

Scottish Government Relationships with Public Bodies (Progress Review)

Meeting date: 6 October 2022

Sharon Dowey

My concern is about whether the deadline will be hit. Recommendations 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 12, 13 and 14—nine of the 14 recommendations—mention that support will be needed from the public bodies unit. How confident are you that you will hit your target of meeting all the recommendations by the end of the year, given that it seems that recommendation 14 is key but has not yet been tied down?

Public Audit Committee

Scottish Government Relationships with Public Bodies (Progress Review)

Meeting date: 6 October 2022

Sharon Dowey

By the end of 2022?

Public Audit Committee

Scottish Government Relationships with Public Bodies (Progress Review)

Meeting date: 6 October 2022

Sharon Dowey

Good morning. Recommendation 13 states that the

“Public Bodies Unit should ensure that coaching and/or mentoring support is offered to the chief executive of every public body, particularly newly-appointed chief executives and those facing challenging situations or intense scrutiny.”

In its response, the Scottish Government indicates that it will increase the support that is provided to chief executives as accountable officers, including by developing a coaching and mentoring system. Will you provide an update on the progress of that work?

Public Audit Committee

“Tackling child poverty”

Meeting date: 6 October 2022

Sharon Dowey

The briefing paper suggests that the Scottish Government did not follow advice from the Poverty and Inequality Commission to ensure that its actions were more clearly linked to targets for reducing child poverty and to be clear about what the impact of each action was expected to be. The paper goes on to state that, because the Scottish Government did not set out what impact the child poverty delivery plan was expected to have, it was not possible to make a proper evaluation of whether the plan delivered its aims. Why did the Scottish Government not act on the commission’s advice and why did it not take steps to ensure that the impact of the plan on child poverty could be properly assessed?