The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1368 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Sharon Dowey
Okay, thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Sharon Dowey
In an ideal world, there would be no fires.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Sharon Dowey
That is fine.
The budget provides for capital funding of £48.4 million in 2026-27, which is an increase of £1.4 million. To what extent do you expect that to allow for necessary improvements in the fire service estate?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Sharon Dowey
Good morning. I have a question on the gap between the funding that you sought and the funding that is provided in the budget. In your written submission, you say:
“We are still reviewing the impact of this and are in discussions internally and with Scottish Government to determine if we can further reduce this gap.”
Could you expand on that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Sharon Dowey
Do you have any confidence that your budget will be increased?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Sharon Dowey
You would not be, because when the public dial 999, they expect a response from the fire service. Regardless of how many fires there are in an area, they expect the response time to be met. You have already said that firefighters do lots of things other than fighting fires, but, nevertheless, we expect them to be there.
The impact of the budget could be that the risk is passed on to the public, because if a station closes, it will take longer for an appliance to get to a call. If a proposal is made to reduce the number of firefighters or to close a station, is a risk assessment done to make people aware of that risk?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Sharon Dowey
You are saying that it is not just fires that you respond to; there are a lot more incidents that you go to, including road traffic accidents.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Sharon Dowey
On part 1 of the bill, Police Scotland has stated that it is
“not of the opinion that the significant investment of budget and resources needed to meet its requirements are proportionate to the potential benefit.”
In addition, the memorandum from the Scottish Government states that
“the Bill does not seem to reach the right balance in what its outcomes would be paired with the costs to public bodies and charities”.
What are your views on those statements?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Sharon Dowey
Thank you. Convener, I have a question on the financial memorandum. Do you want me to come in with that at the end of the meeting?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Sharon Dowey
Finally, when you attended the Criminal Justice Committee on 25 June to give evidence on the bill, you stated that your bill would cost, at most, £23 million but would result in savings of
“£7 billion over a three-year average period of abuse.”—[Official Report, Criminal Justice Committee, 25 June 2025; c 4.]
Given the views that you have heard from stakeholders and the response that we have had from the Finance and Public Administration Committee on the cost of the bill—specifically, the cost of setting up and maintaining the register—have your predicted costs changed in any way?