The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1943 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Sharon Dowey
Good morning. I have questions about resources. Some witnesses, including those representing COSLA and Police Scotland, raised concerns about a lack of resources to support the effective implementation of the proposals. What discussions have you had about those concerns?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Sharon Dowey
There were general concerns about the bill’s financial implications. In its submission, Police Scotland said a lot about its concerns about the financial memorandum. It also said that it wanted a lot more communication with the Scottish Government. COSLA also mentioned the issue. There was a lot of concern about the financial memorandum.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Sharon Dowey
Scottish Women’s Aid raised concern about the financial memorandum’s near silence on costs, especially those that are associated with part 2. Dr Marsha Scott expressed concern about the
“failure to implement the Children (Scotland) Act 2020 and the Domestic Abuse (Protection) (Scotland) Act 2021”
due to money not being
“set aside in the process of passing those acts.”—[Official Report, Criminal Justice Committee, 5 February 2025; c 5.]
I am looking for reassurance that enough money will be set aside for this bill.
Going back to Liam Kerr’s earlier point, there will be a six-month period between the Parliament passing the bill and the commencement of the provisions. We do not want to be in a situation where not enough money has been set aside in the first place so the legislation just sits on a shelf and is not implemented because the finances are not there.
10:45Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Sharon Dowey
Dr Scott, do you have any comments on that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Sharon Dowey
Fiona Drouet, in your submission, you mention the university
“failing to recognise so many warning signs, missing opportunities to intervene”.
Would the reviews that are currently available cover that? If not, would the reviews that are included in the bill cover that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Sharon Dowey
The Social Work Scotland submission mentions that a key organisation—Child Protection Committees Scotland—has not been engaged with. Are you aware of any other key groups that have not been engaged with?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Sharon Dowey
It is good to hear that you all support the bill. I do not think that you are putting up barriers; it is perhaps the practicalities of implementing the bill that everybody is concerned about.
In your written submissions and in your opening statements today, everybody mentioned a lack of engagement. Police Scotland said in its submission last week that there was a lack of engagement and that it wanted more communication. I think that it was Police Scotland that said that part 2 had been “‘tacked’ onto the end” of the bill.
My quick question on engagement is this: do you have a note of how many meetings and how much correspondence you have had with the Scottish Government on part 2 of the bill? Is that information available?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Sharon Dowey
Do we just need to review and refine what we have already, rather than implement the bill? Do we need to legislate or to refine what we already have? I have a concern that everybody is spending all their time doing reviews, but nobody is implementing the actions from that work so we do not get the outcome that we need.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Sharon Dowey
No current review process would have covered that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Sharon Dowey
Some of the written evidence has raised concerns about adding a new system of reviews to an already complex review landscape. Do you share those concerns? If so, what could we do to alleviate potential problems?