The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1169 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Sharon Dowey
My next question is for Professor Munro and Professor Chalmers. The Scottish Solicitors Bar Association has said that
“no amount of judicial training or legal direction can remove unconscious biases.”
Is a single judge not also susceptible to the same rape myths and unconscious biases? I ask Professor Munro first.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Sharon Dowey
I have a question on the pilot itself, which I will put first to Professor Chalmers. We have heard from various witnesses that such a pilot would need extensive debate and discussion. Are you at all concerned that the details of the pilot are not included in the bill and will be brought in through secondary legislation? Might that mean that we will not interrogate the proposal as much as we could if it was contained in the bill?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Sharon Dowey
Resource is probably the answer to my next question, too. In the Law Society of Scotland’s submission, you noted that the requirement that solicitors and advocates take an
“approved course on training on trauma-informed practice”
in order to represent clients in the new court would
“restrict the capacity of defence solicitors”,
considering the restraints that they are already under with legal aid. Again, do you think that the Scottish Government has to fund the defence properly before the reforms are passed?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Sharon Dowey
Good morning. My first question is for Professor Thomas. You said in your submission that the reason for juryless rape trials being considered in the bill is because of the low conviction rate in Scotland. Is it acceptable to remove juries for the sole reason of increasing the conviction rate?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Sharon Dowey
Does anyone else have any comments?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Sharon Dowey
Although it has been suggested that other parts of the court estate could be used, you would still want cases to have the prominence that comes from them being heard in the High Court.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Sharon Dowey
We heard from the previous panel about a lack of communication. We have heard about independent legal representation, too. Do you think that we should consider allowing more access to the advocate?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Sharon Dowey
Moving on, I note that the bill obliges all courts to roll out trauma-informed practice. What extra trauma-informed practice or training would you expect to see in a specialist court that you do not get in other courts already?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Sharon Dowey
Good morning. I agree with a lot of what you have just said. I am concerned that we spend too much time tying ourselves up in legislation when there might be small changes that we could make just now that would make a huge impact on survivors, one of which would probably be improving communication at courts. There are a lot of things that we could do just now, rather than having to wait until we get to the end of the process.
What is your vision of specialist courts? We have already heard that we will be using the existing court estate. How many existing buildings do you expect will be classed as having a specialist court within them, and how does that number compare with what is being used now? We can start with Sandy Brindley.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Sharon Dowey
I am afraid that that does not make things any clearer for me. [Laughter.]