The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1114 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2023
Sharon Dowey
Is work being done to ensure that everybody uses the same system? One complaint that I have heard from consultants when I have been out talking to them is the fact that the boards have different computer systems, so if patients go between boards, they have to spend hours on telephones to get information. Is any work being done to ensure that everybody uses systems that speak to each other?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2023
Sharon Dowey
What, in the NHS England system, is different from our system that means that it can report the data just now?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2023
Sharon Dowey
You spoke about collecting a lot of data, and you mentioned the UK benchmarking. How readily available are all those reports for us to see how well we are doing?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2023
Sharon Dowey
I come to my final question. Has the Scottish Government provided funding to NHS Education for Scotland to develop the mental health workforce statistical publication? That was also mentioned in the report.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2023
Sharon Dowey
The report provides some detail about a piece of work that is intended to “significantly improve” the availability of mental health workforce data. There may, therefore, be implications for mental health if we do not put the money in. The phrase “spend to save” is being used just now. We need to ensure that the data that we get ensures that the money that we put in gives us the right outcomes. Are there implications if we do not provide the money for that piece of work?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2023
Sharon Dowey
Are there any timelines for when everybody will be using the same system? That would obviously help the mental health of GPs, consultants and patients.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2023
Sharon Dowey
So, we are not working towards having the same system—it is just about data collection.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2023
Sharon Dowey
The report also states:
“The Scottish Government and health and social care partners should learn from NHS England, which publishes more detailed information on mental health services regularly.”
It says that the NHS England data is not complete and that there are still issues there, but it also says that
“information is now routinely published on service activity and performance, spending and inequalities.”
Do you plan to learn from NHS England? What measures can you implement from there?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2023
Sharon Dowey
So no funding has been given to it as yet.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2023
Sharon Dowey
I want to ask about jury majorities. You said that, at the moment, we have 15 jurors and the decision to send somebody to jail may be based on the decision of one person if there is an eight to seven majority verdict. Would you like there to be a change to unanimity, or, if the jury size reduces to 12, for eight out of 12 to be needed to reach a verdict? What are your opinions on unanimity?