The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1169 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Sharon Dowey
You said that the conduct regulations would be reviewed once the bill had been passed. Why can they not be reviewed and actioned just now? Why do we have to wait for the bill to be passed? If you are getting complaints and you know what the issues are, why are you not reviewing all the misconduct regulations now? When we had the Scottish Police Federation in to give evidence, it said that performance and misconduct regulations are not being implemented just now. Do you come across that in complaints, and why are the police not currently implementing the regulations that they already have?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Sharon Dowey
We heard evidence from the Scottish Police Federation that some issues with the complaints and misconduct processes could be dealt with through the existing conduct and performance regulations, but they have never been enacted properly. They are now seen as a punishment, and the system
“investigates ... at the top level and not at the bottom level”.—[Official Report, Criminal Justice Committee, 8 May 2024; c 28.]
Could I get your comments on that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Sharon Dowey
When there is irrefutable evidence, do you still have to pay somebody in their employment up to the point that it gets to a court case, even though it is obvious that they will not be able to continue in employment?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Sharon Dowey
So you need legislation for some things, but do you need training for other bits? Is there a lack of training in some areas? One of our witnesses heard that he had been put on to restricted duties, but he was never told why; since then, we have heard more evidence that there was no reason why that should have happened. I find it hard to believe that somebody could be either suspended or put on restricted duties without being told why. Is there a training or performance management issue there?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Sharon Dowey
I want to follow on from your conversation with the convener and ask again about what difference a code of ethics will have if there are no sanctions. The code has been described as symbolic; you are saying that what we are putting in legislation is really just a guide and that the disciplinary processes should be separate.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Sharon Dowey
So, it is something to aspire to. In that case, is there any benefit in putting it in legislation?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Sharon Dowey
I perhaps need to get my head around what actually needs legislation and what can be put into your handbook, if you like.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2024
Sharon Dowey
One witness said that he was placed on restricted duties and told that he was a danger to the public, but he was not informed why that was the case. Yesterday, we heard from the criminal allegations against the police division of the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service that there was no reason why he should not have been told at the time. The Scottish Police Federation has questioned whether some of the legislation is required, or whether the performance management tools and regulations that are already in place simply need to be used. I do not know whether you have had a chance to look at everything that is in the bill, but do you think that some of the legislation is not required and that we need to look at the training in the police to ensure that they are following their own procedures?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2024
Sharon Dowey
You mentioned random vetting and the power for summary dismissal. Do you think that that needs to be in police policy and procedure, or is legislation required?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2024
Sharon Dowey
As I said, the bill requires more regulations. However, we heard from the Scottish Police Federation that current performance and misconduct regulations have never been used. Do we need to look more at performance management within Police Scotland to ensure that it is using the tools that it already has?