The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1114 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Sharon Dowey
There is still some more work to be done to make sure that the money follows the child rather than the postcode.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Sharon Dowey
You talk about having a “rounded suite”. On that issue, there has been a lot of talk of “doing in” the exam results. What are your thoughts on whether we should keep exams or get rid of them?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2021
Sharon Dowey
I have a couple of questions on section 22 reports. I will not ask you which bodies might be subject to such reports this year, but how many section 22 reports do you expect to lay before Parliament this year? Do you think that the number will increase? If so, is that directly related to the Covid-19 pandemic?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2021
Sharon Dowey
You touched on my next question when you mentioned that section 22 reports are known as “What went wrong?” reports. What are your views on publishing a section 22 report when the annual audit has picked up exceptional work that could be used to highlight good practice across the public sector?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2021
Sharon Dowey
That is good—we can change them into “What went right?” reports.
I have a quick question on planned performance audit reports. There are obviously a lot of problems just now with ferries, which are still causing issues for residents on islands and their friends and families from the mainland who want to visit them. Because we are being encouraged to have staycations, people are trying to get on ferries, so the problems are also affecting the islands’ local economies. What is the scope of the current inquiry into the new ferries and when do you plan to report on it? You have put the date for that down as March 2022, but will we be on track to get a report then? It is obviously quite urgent.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 1 September 2021
Sharon Dowey
I have no relevant interests to declare.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 1 September 2021
Sharon Dowey
I nominate Colin Beattie.
Colin Beattie was chosen as chair.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 1 September 2021
Sharon Dowey
Alexander Sloan’s work on the audit of Audit Scotland’s annual report and accounts was delivered remotely during the period of Government restrictions and guidance to work at home where possible. Will you tell us about the changes to Alexander Sloan’s approach to the audit, to allow us to understand the challenges that remote auditing presents, and the impact that it had on the audit?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 1 September 2021
Sharon Dowey
Has working remotely led to any beneficial innovations in the audit process that could be adapted going forward?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 1 September 2021
Sharon Dowey
Okay. On Audit Scotland’s work programme, we know the reasons for the change of focus—that is because of the impact of the pandemic. Can you provide us with further information on how parts of the former work programme were identified as suitable for deferment or cancellation? How does the board assure itself that any risks or issues in those areas have not subsequently deteriorated?