Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Session 6: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
  7. Current session: 14 May 2026 to 13 October 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 24 contributions

|

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Women’s Poverty

Meeting date: 8 October 2026

Carol Mochan

I appreciate being able to come in on this point. In the chamber earlier in the week, I asked the First Minister whether legislative changes might be required to get consistency. I hope that what I am hearing is that if we did need to make legislative changes, we might be able to do that. Does the cabinet secretary think that we might need to make legislative changes, and would there be a willingness in the Cabinet to do that?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Women’s Poverty

Meeting date: 8 October 2026

Carol Mochan

Thank you. I really appreciate all of today’s discussion. I have a question for the cabinet secretary, which is about public sector reform and women in the workplace. Many lower-paid jobs are done by women, as is some of our more precarious work, where people have two or three different contracts, perhaps working in areas such as school meals provision, cleaning services or similar essential roles. There is concern that those are the kinds of posts that are most likely to be made redundant or to have contract changes. Given that most of those jobs are done by women, and women working in such areas have the highest levels of poverty, can the cabinet secretary assure us that that will not be the case?

10:45

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Women’s Poverty

Meeting date: 8 October 2026

Carol Mochan

Do we have a defined example or wording for what the Government means by “front-line staff” and “backroom staff”? Do we have that written down anywhere?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Women’s Poverty

Meeting date: 8 October 2026

Carol Mochan

I press you, cabinet secretary, to give us a timeline for when we might be able to see in writing which roles will go. All those staff are workers, so they will be concerned about whether they could be targeted. In the context that we are talking about, women will be fearful that their jobs could go.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Women’s Poverty

Meeting date: 1 October 2026

Carol Mochan

I am one of the MSPs who represent South Scotland.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Women’s Poverty

Meeting date: 1 October 2026

Carol Mochan

Is that kind of access available in the right places for people? Are the services based where they should be, so that they are accessible? We talked about how women’s lives can be quite complicated. They might be struggling with transport or childcare, or they might be in an abusive relationship and need to access services in private. Are those services available to people in their communities?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Women’s Poverty

Meeting date: 1 October 2026

Carol Mochan

A lot of the points that I was going to ask about have been covered. I am really interested in the public debt element and the way in which we aggressively pursue that. There needs to be a change in that regard.

My question is for Charis Chittick or Sara Cowan. Is there a reason why the set-up does not allow women to get that advice early on? Are there things that we could do that might help women get advice earlier, so that the issue does not have a longer-term impact on their health, their family and their decision making? Is there anything in that area that we could recommend to the Government?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice (Overview)

Meeting date: 24 September 2026

Carol Mochan

Thank you so much for the information that you have provided this morning, minister. My question builds on what colleagues have been speaking about. We heard in the round-table meeting that there is the feeling in the civil justice sector that there are some really good laws but that, for various reasons, we are not able to implement them. What are the Government’s reflections on that?

Some interesting issues came out of the meeting. How do we crack the nut on things such as advocacy services being available in our most deprived communities? We heard that people in those communities often do not understand or know what laws are there to support them, but they need to be able to access advocacy. As a new minister, what are your reflections on what we might be able to do in this parliamentary session to ensure that people’s rights are realised?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 24 September 2026

Carol Mochan

It is really important to try to understand this SSI. I was not involved in the committee in previous years, so it has been really helpful to have you here and to hear that there would be a review process over three years.

If we did not pass the SSI at this point, could the review continue? Would that happen? Do we need to pass the SSI to allow the review to happen, or is it more that you feel that we will not have enough people undertaking the role if we do not get this uplift?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 24 September 2026

Carol Mochan

I have one more question. Again, it is to help me to understand this. The papers say that the threshold for lower-value court work is set at £1,500, but that has not been reviewed since 2008. Is there a reason for that, given that we are talking about uplifts for other things?

I also have a further concern. My reading of our papers is that, when the costs are passed on in the case of people with lower debt that is likely to be linked to poverty, or in the case of public debt, the individuals concerned could have proportionally more debt passed on to them than would be the case with some of the higher-value debt. Is that the correct reading of the information?