Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Session 6: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
  7. Current session: 14 May 2026 to 2 November 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 146 contributions

|

Social Justice, Housing and Local Government Committee [Draft]

Social Security

Meeting date: 30 September 2026

Craig Hoy

That has been very helpful. I thank everybody around the table for what has been a productive two hours.

The committee will not meet next week. We will be back on 28 October, when we will be looking further into the issue of child poverty.

I thank witnesses again for joining us. As always, if there is anything that we discussed that you want to elaborate on, or something that we did not discuss, the committee would welcome your correspondence and suggestions.

11:32

Meeting continued in private until 11:52.

Social Justice, Housing and Local Government Committee [Draft]

Social Security

Meeting date: 30 September 2026

Craig Hoy

Fiona Collie wants to come in.

Social Justice, Housing and Local Government Committee [Draft]

Social Security

Meeting date: 30 September 2026

Craig Hoy

I will bring in Emma Jackson before we turn to some detailed questions on carers benefit, and perhaps bring in Mr Traynor.

Social Justice, Housing and Local Government Committee [Draft]

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2027-28

Meeting date: 23 September 2026

Craig Hoy

A careful balance needs to be struck. A requirement for a formal diagnosis would potentially medicalise a condition, but would it not also open up new pathways for treatments that people who do not go through that process might not be able to access? That leads to the pejorative expression that some people are “parked on benefits” when they should be seeking treatment that would enable them to tackle the effects of their disability.

Social Justice, Housing and Local Government Committee [Draft]

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2027-28

Meeting date: 23 September 2026

Craig Hoy

I have one final question, which relates to the point in your report about concerns from welfare rights advisers about inconsistent decision making. Again, that appeared to be largely anecdotal.

My concern is that, if imprecise decisions are taken, or if decisions are not as consistent as they could be—where, for example, a redetermination comes up with a very different conclusion from the original decision—that perhaps points to a systemic failure. Since your report was published, the initial authorisation rate has fallen to 31 per cent, which is a significant difference. That might be welcome, because there might have been people who were receiving the benefit who, for other reasons, perhaps should not have been approved, but it also points to the fact that the approach could still be quite haphazard.

What evidence would you want to establish to reflect whether the reduction in authorisations reflects, for example, a changing applicant mix or potentially a change in decision-making practice?

Social Justice, Housing and Local Government Committee [Draft]

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2027-28

Meeting date: 23 September 2026

Craig Hoy

That is helpful.

Social Justice, Housing and Local Government Committee [Draft]

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2027-28

Meeting date: 23 September 2026

Craig Hoy

The pressures on the Scottish Government budget have been laid out by other organisations, including yours, in the past. At this point in the 2026-27 budget—I had to correct myself earlier —where do you think that we are? Are the pressures intensifying, or do you get the impression that things are easing off?

Social Justice, Housing and Local Government Committee [Draft]

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2027-28

Meeting date: 23 September 2026

Craig Hoy

When the Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice and Housing was before us, it was put to her that the benchmarking and data that the Government has for assessing the additional costs that people with different disabilities face is not yet properly baselined or modelled. When I asked Shirley-Anne Somerville what additional costs might be experienced by somebody who suffered from mild anxiety, the one example that she came up with was that, potentially, they might have to use other forms of transport because they might not be able to travel on crowded public transport. However, independent commentators have still said that, particularly in relation to mental health issues, the Government has not yet come up with definitive numbers on additional costs. Would you encourage greater modelling and greater assessment of that?

Social Justice, Housing and Local Government Committee [Draft]

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2027-28

Meeting date: 23 September 2026

Craig Hoy

—and I asked him how much of that had been banked and delivered, but he could not give me the answer. We could be in a situation in which the Government does not realise those savings, which would have negative consequences for future years’ budgets.

Hannah Randolph, do you have any closing thoughts on the public sector reform programme, because that is a potential downside risk that could affect the Government’s ability to continue to spend on social security at present levels.

Social Justice, Housing and Local Government Committee [Draft]

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2027-28

Meeting date: 23 September 2026

Craig Hoy

I do not know who would want to come in on this, but I want to capture this point for the record. There were obviously predictions about the way that the adult disability budget was going to progress, in the number of new applicants, the number of people that would be removed from the benefit, and the disparity between what is spent in Scotland and in the rest of the UK.

Some of the more dire warnings about what was happening in Scotland versus the rest of the UK do not appear to be materialising. How is the profile of that expenditure comparing with how we might have thought about it two or three years ago when the benefit was first devolved and we saw the initial trends in relation to ADP?