The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 854 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
Tess White
If the kit is not working, we need to ask why that is. That needs to be looked at.
With regard to workforce planning, each individual health board seems to do its own workforce planning, but we do not have a holistic Scotland-wide workforce plan. The danger of that is that we rob Peter to pay Paul. People might flock to where there are specialists in, say, cancer treatment, which creates an issue. Would you say that having a holistic workforce plan is a massive priority?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
Tess White
So we need to have a workforce plan.
I would like to go to Professor Din, who was nodding. We talked about the fact that surgeons are in their happy place when they are doing surgery. What other barriers are there?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
Tess White
Before I go on to my second question, I note that some areas or regions would say that they do implement self-directed support, while some scarcely implement it. Do you have any views on that, Dr Kellock?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
Tess White
My second question is whether panel members think that amendments to the National Care Service (Scotland) Bill or the Public Bodies (Joint Working) (Scotland) Act 2014 are required to ensure the successful implementation of self-directed support. Has the SDS collaboration discussed that? Who would like to go first on that question?
11:00Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
Tess White
I want to come back to what Peter Hastie said about it being good to have the data from previous quarters. That is such a basic point. Why is the centre for sustainable delivery not providing that data? Why would you need to come to us and ask SPICe to do that research? To me, everything is about the data. Perhaps Katie Cuthbertson could answer Peter’s question about why the data is not there.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
Tess White
So you do not have the performance data to look at sustainable development. I am just wondering how you can do sustainable development if you do not have basic data.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
Tess White
I was asking about Peter Hastie’s question about looking back at the quarters when the kit broke down.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
Tess White
Thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2024
Tess White
I would like Labour and everybody else to reconsider for the sake of clarity. Amendment 51 is important for clarity and enforcement. If there is no proper signage, it will be very difficult to enforce, and leaving it up to the health boards is not good enough.
The financial memorandum states:
“There is no requirement in the Bill for signage to be displayed outside a protected premises, and there is no expectation at present for signage to be required.”
I remember that, when the minister gave evidence to the committee at stage 1, we had a discussion about signage and how it would be on-going. Amendment 51 seems to give sufficient flexibility and it is not particularly prescriptive or onerous. I also note that it includes regulation-making powers for Scottish ministers. That is why I encourage the committee to reconsider and review the issue and put signage in the bill.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2024
Tess White
Thank you for that. It is important to go back to the substance of the committee’s report in that respect.