The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 946 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Tess White
Neil Gray has said that long waits for routine operations for people in rural areas are unacceptable. In my area, which is largely rural, there are waits of up to five years for hip and knee replacements and waits of just under two years for cataract operations. Given that you have the data, you will know that those long waits largely affect people with an ageing profile. We are talking about huge waits, so if we are collecting data by age, do you agree that, in relation to the public sector equality duty, as a country, we are failing elderly people in rural areas?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Tess White
My next question—
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Tess White
—[Inaudible.]—extremely valuable.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Tess White
That’s fine, convener. I was making a comment before asking a question. The SHRC’s spotlight report on the Highlands and Islands was particularly valuable to the committee. It is a shame that it could not look more widely across other rural areas.
My first question, minister, picks up on Anna Densham’s point about the importance of data. In particular, there is a perception, which the data supports, of an idea of the slow creep of centralisation.
You say that there are multiple areas, so where should you start? You start with the data. The public sector equality duties fall under your remit. Age and the increasing age profile of the population is a huge issue in rural areas. My question to you, minister, and to Anna Densham is whether you collect data on the nine protected characteristics, particularly age.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Tess White
I ask Anna Densham to address the specific question. I understand from your answer, minister, that you do not collect Scotland-wide data on the nine protected characteristics and that you leave that to the individual areas. Is that correct? There is no recording and data collection against the nine protected characteristics, particularly age.
Seriously—it is either yes or no. As a committee, it helps us to know that there is a data gap. When we look at public sector equality duties, we will know that we need to look at age because, as the spotlight report indicates, that is a huge issue in rural areas. The answer is yes and no: yes, it is important, but, no, you do not collect the nine protected characteristics—age being number 1—across Scotland.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Tess White
Good morning, minister. It is good to hear that your meeting with the cabinet secretary for health went well and that you discussed a number of cross-cutting themes. Which cross-cutting themes did you discuss? Is there anything that you would like to share with the committee?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Tess White
On waiting lists, Councillor Geva Blackett has said that, under the Equality Act 2010, it is unlawful to discriminate because of certain characteristics when you are being provided with a public service, such as health or social care. She said that the very first of those protected characteristics is age and the fifth is pregnancy and maternity, yet health and social care is not equitably accessible to those living in remote and rural areas.
Were you able to drill down with the cabinet sectary on those two protected characteristics of age and pregnancy and maternity in relation to the Equality Act 2010, or was your discussion just a wide-ranging one on general treatment waiting times?
10:15Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Tess White
Just in rural areas.
Another issue is the definition of “rural”. Aberdeenshire, which is a largely rural area, is not funded as a rural area. There are huge issues with general practices in Portsoy, Fyvie and Inverurie; those practices are struggling. The British Medical Association has cited huge issues with the 2018 GP contract, which favours GPs in cities and lets down those in rural areas. In relation to the contract, which was not voted on by GPs in rural areas, the BMA has said that the Scottish Government
“has been unable to deliver on their promise to the profession and the public because of waning political support as shown by reduced and withdrawn investment, broken agreements, inadequate workforce planning, and an inability to implement an ambitious contract that relies on primary care service delivery transformation.”
The nub of the problem is that the 2018 contract fails GPs in rural areas, so general practices in those areas are closing or threatening to close. Last week, Maree Todd and I were at an event with the Royal College of General Practitioners, which talked about the huge crisis that we face. However, there is no appetite to revisit the 2018 GP contract. That is a massive issue in rural areas, so have you and Neil Gray discussed it?
11:00Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Tess White
Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Tess White
It does, but you have talked only about the islands, whereas I am referring to the bulk of rural areas, in Aberdeenshire and the Highlands. The programme is not working because general practices in rural areas are struggling as a result of the 2018 contract. I will leave you to follow up that issue with the cabinet secretary—thank you for taking that on.