The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1554 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Tess White
In the previous evidence session, we heard the Scottish Human Rights Commission talk about quality assurance. Will the Scottish Government—you are the cabinet secretary, and we have the minister here, too—ensure that there is quality assurance so that the organisations that you fund are not operating unlawfully? That is my final question.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Tess White
I will pass back to the convener.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Tess White
My next question is for Emma Congreve. The feedback that we have been given this morning is that there is, as Angela O’Hagan put it, a
“gap between narrative and practice.”
We hear these words, but it is quite damning that, although something is said, nothing happens and things are kicked down the road. In your view, does the Scottish Government’s positive narrative in the equality and fairer Scotland budget statement and in its budget responses to the committee reflect the reality in relation to policy impact and the changes that it has made to budget processes, data and documentation?
You are smiling, Emma.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Tess White
We hear you loud and clear on those very important points. The mood music can quickly turn sour if there is no delivery. I read in the papers today about carers going on strike. People have had enough if their basic needs are not being met. I also refer to the point that Emma Congreve made about the Pareto principle and the focus on the few important things. We had an example this morning of people being locked up. The committee learned about the huge percentage of women and girls with learning difficulties who are being sexually assaulted. That resonated loud and clear. The Promise, social security and violence against women and girls have also been mentioned. As I said, we hear you loud and clear.
The next evidence session is with the Minister for Equalities and the Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Local Government, and it is our job to take what you have shared with us this morning, and what we have heard over the past few months, and to present it to the Scottish Government—so, thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Tess White
Good morning. The human rights bill has been flagged as essential to helping citizens to understand minimum core requirements. How is the Scottish Government working to progress the public’s understanding of human rights, given the decision not to legislate during this session?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Tess White
Thank you, cabinet secretary, but, in the previous evidence session this morning, we heard a huge concern about the gap between narrative and practice. With something as clearly beneficial as breastfeeding, if even the most basic provision is not being followed through with defined minimum core criteria, do you have a concern that there needs to be a tighter follow-through to ensure that there is accountability for that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Tess White
On 6 May, you and your official, Cat McMeeken, gave evidence to this committee. Your official responded to my questions regarding funding for third sector organisations that are supported by the equality and human rights fund. Ms McMeeken stated that the Scottish Government does not
“provide core funding, which is for the wider lobbying activities that organisations do. It is much more about giving funding for specific services.”—[Official Report, Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee, 6 May 2025; c 20.]
That is also what you have just said, minister. Why, then, did the fund manager, Inspiring Scotland, specifically include a list of the advocacy work that is carried out by the Equality Network, LEAP Sports Scotland, LGBT Youth Scotland, the LGBT Healthy Living Centre and Stonewall on gender identity services in a recent progress report on the equality and human rights fund? That is a specific question, minister. If you do not know the answer, I am happy to follow up with you separately.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Tess White
That is an answer to a different question from the one that I asked.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Tess White
In the interests of time, convener, I will pass back to you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Tess White
Thank you. This evidence session is about accountability. You used the terms “should be”, “obliged”, “must” and “minimum protections”. Yet, the Scottish Human Rights Commission has been operating for 17 years without any legal enforcement powers, and its remit is still based on the legislation that created it, the Scottish Commission for Human Rights Act 2006. Scottish National Party ministers, including yourself, have recently shelved the human rights bill that could have at least given the SHRC some teeth, which it needs because it cannot otherwise enforce. How can the SNP Government claim that it is committed to human rights when it has not delivered the legislation to improve scrutiny of its human rights record?