The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1387 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Tess White
I have one minute left, so I will not take an intervention.
The Scottish National Party refused to give hospitality and leisure businesses a full year of non-domestic rates relief to provide some financial headroom, until the Scottish Conservatives secured a U-turn earlier this year.
Despite already being in a fragile state, the hospitality sector is also dealing with the fall-out from the vaccination passport shambles. The vice-chairman of the Night Time Industries Association Scotland, whose hospitality group owns a number of venues in the north-east, said last week:
“It is utterly bewildering the Scottish Government have completely ignored the warnings from sectoral experts … It has taken just one week for our concerns around market distortion, unfair competition, discrimination and the severe economic impact to be proven true”.
I have made those points because the Scottish Government’s decisions affect the operating environment for the sector. It follows that the decisions affect hospitality workers, who face losing up to £200 a week in wages because of that poorly executed scheme.
The SNP claims that it does not have sufficient levers to promote fair work, but the problem is in the engine room. In the programme for government, the First Minister reiterated her party’s support for a four-day working week as part of a wellbeing economy. That would be a monumental shift in working patterns that would require careful and detailed planning, which is a worrying prospect for many businesses that are already stretched thin and are trying to make ends meet.
When I asked the Cabinet Secretary for Finance and the Economy about the £10 million pilot, no detail was forthcoming; the matter was kicked into the long grass. That is the problem; the SNP seems to be paying lip service to policy ideas without delivering on the detail. It is full of promises, but it does not follow through.
That is not just my view. Earlier this year, the Carnegie UK Trust identified an implementation gap between the Scottish Government’s rhetoric and its delivery on fair work policies. The left-wing Jimmy Reid Foundation has, similarly, criticised the SNP Government of 2016 to 2021 for not matching its rhetoric with its actions, and has highlighted the devolved powers that are already at the Scottish Government’s disposal in the area.
As we learn to live with Covid-19 and recover from the pandemic, we have the opportunity not just to revive our economy but to reset it. We are building back fairer and greener, but during this period of change, we must be mindful as politicians to take people and businesses with us. We need to restore confidence as well as trust.
15:43Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Tess White
It is a change and there is a concern. If there have been no complaints and nobody has found any difficulties, why make the tweak?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Tess White
So it is not that important to you. It is just a tweak.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Tess White
So you are making the change because of a suggestion that has come from somebody else, rather than a complaint that you have received or data. Bearing in mind the Conservatives’ position on prisoner voting, I would ask what is to prevent us from leaving the situation as it is now, because the change is an area of concern, and then reviewing it at some future stage.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Tess White
Yes. I am suggesting leaving the situation as it is currently, whereby you send the poll card to the home address. Some people would prefer to have it sent to their home address, because they get everything sent there. You would be making an exception with this change. Have you sought people’s input?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Tess White
Thank you.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Tess White
I am just saying that it is an area of concern. I recommend that we leave things as they are now rather than change anything. Will you consider doing that, minister?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Tess White
So your focus is on keeping women out of prison.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Tess White
Does that mean that you will not be focusing on the safety of women in prison?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Tess White
Thank you. I have to say that I fully support this proposed CPG.