The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1445 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Tess White
If representatives of colleges were here now, they would say that colleges are on their knees, so—
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Tess White
Thank you. I especially thank you, Lucy. I realise that giving that evidence in front of a committee was probably difficult, but it is a very important topic.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Tess White
At the current glacial rate of investment, it would take the SNP Government until 2083 to spend the so-called just transition fund. The cabinet secretary will be 114 years old, and the minister will be 112 years old. Against that background, could the minister outline how the SNP Government will meet the remaining commitment for the fund in the next session of the Parliament?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Tess White
I thank the cabinet secretary for advance sight of his statement.
Neil Gray visited Aberdeen royal infirmary in February this year. He promised that he would do everything that he could to improve the situation there. However, we have only to look at this week’s ambulance waiting times to see that it is getting worse. With lives at stake, it does not give a single person here any pleasure at all to point out that the Scottish National Party has failed NHS Grampian and its patients.
The reasons for such a dire performance and stage 4 escalation are not the junior doctors, nurses, paramedics and porters—they are trying their absolute level best. No, NHS Grampian is in such trouble because it has been hollowed out by successive SNP Governments. The health board has a history of chronic underfunding, persistent understaffing, the lowest bed base in Scotland per head of population and a national treatment centre on ice. There are massive cuts to health and social care partnership budgets for caring for the elderly and vulnerable. General practitioner practices are folding and major injuries units are on restricted hours.
The Scottish Conservatives have repeatedly warned the SNP Government about this perfect storm. With underfunding of a quarter of a billion pounds, how can NHS Grampian be expected to pay back a Government loan? What is the trigger point for escalation to stage 5?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Tess White
I have two questions for Mr Lancaster. We have heard that finding a solicitor to help the most vulnerable people in domestic abuse cases, particularly where they are experiencing financial abuse, is almost like trying to find hens’ teeth. Women, especially, have had to look at or approach around 100 solicitors to find help. Are you concerned about that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Tess White
I suggest that you have more power and influence than you think. You can sit down with the Law Society and talk to it about the pool of solicitors, and influence the universities. A few weeks ago, we heard how, during the Covid pandemic, places were provided to trainee solicitors for early entry into the profession to undertake the type of work that we are discussing. However, that seems to have dried up. I almost feel that you have given up when you say, “It doesn’t lie with me—I can’t do anything about it.” You actually can do something about it.
The system is broken and overly complex, and there are not enough solicitors. People are having to phone not just 30 solicitors, but more, and we are hearing about women who have experienced domestic abuse, who are homeless and have suffered financial abuse, and who have nowhere to go. If the situation is so bad—as it seems to be, because we are hearing evidence of that—what is stopping you sitting down with the Law Society and looking at the number of solicitors who are being trained? Does that number need to be increased? What areas of work are the solicitors going into? How many of them are doing legal aid? Should we provide certain funded positions, as was done during Covid? I put it back to you that to sit down with the Law Society, and work out some solutions and come up with some ideas, might be a way forward.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Tess White
Thank you. Back to you, convener.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Tess White
You did not really answer the question, which was this: are you, personally, concerned about the issue?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Tess White
My second question is about the pool of solicitors. There seems to be a systemic problem in that there are not enough solicitors to do the work. In the nine years that you have been chief executive of SLAB, have you sat down with the Law Society to discuss that systemic issue?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Tess White
Professor Boyle, I found it really interesting when you talked about fragmentation and systemic issues. For example, groups such as For Women Scotland are increasingly using crowdfunding to fund challenges to the Scottish Government’s interpretation and implementation of the law. Crowdfunding is becoming a powerful tool to shape change, but it is not always an option for individuals, community groups and other organisations. What role does civil legal assistance play in supporting access to justice in such situations? Could it have an expanded role?