The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1752 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, cabinet secretary and officials. Thank you for joining us this morning. I have a couple of questions on slightly different but related points. I will stick with part 1 for now. Many stakeholders have said that the bill conflates religious observance with religious and moral education. Although that is the case in existing legislation, we have heard quite a lot of very clear evidence and very strong support for the view that it should not be possible to opt out of RME, because of its value and its educational role in our society. Why did the Government not take the opportunity with this legislation to make that distinction in law and say, “RME is core to our curriculum and we will not have young people opting out, whether it is them or their parents doing that, because it is a fundamental area of our education”?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thank you. Those comments are useful, and they reinforce what Marie McNair said about the need for clear guidance on interpretation so that children and young people are not forced to take that step to seek clarification of whether an exemption should apply through the courts. We do not want our young people to have to do that. I hope that we would have systems in place that deal with some of those issues before court actions and court decisions are required. That was a helpful clarification.
Cabinet secretary, my final question relates to something that you said in your letter to the committee, in which you talked about engagement with the UK Government to explore the
“removal of any legislative restrictions that currently limit the Scottish Parliament’s ability to enhance human rights protections”.
You said that if there was no progress within the next 12 months, the Scottish Government would commission a review of UK acts. Can you say a little bit more about the rationale for the 12-month period and how those conversations with the UK Government are going?
11:15Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
I was not suggesting that RME be put on a statutory footing.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
However, there is clear agreement that RME is distinct, and you said in your opening remarks that RME and RO are distinct. RME is a core part of curriculum for excellence, so why not take the opportunity to separate them in law? I am not saying that we should put one of them on a statutory footing; however, as CFE suggests, RME is core to young people’s understanding, education and development when it comes to learning how to be citizens and how to interact with, learn about and understand other faiths, belief systems and ethical questions.
Why give people the option to withdraw from that, given that some of our witnesses have suggested that doing so could be the thin edge of the wedge? If people do not like some of the science courses, can they opt out of them? That is the kind of question that we have wrestled with when gathering evidence. I am curious about why the decision was taken not to separate RO and RME, not necessarily about whether one or the other will not be put on a statutory footing.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
It is interesting that you talk about strengthening children’s rights and yet you are not proposing to give children that independent right. However—
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
I want to follow up on Rhoda Grant’s questions on the impact of part 2. Given the unlikelihood of incompatibility arising—we hope that, from now on, all bills will be drafted to be compatible with the 2024 act—how does the cabinet secretary see the exemption in part 2 affecting young people’s access to justice? You talked about that in the letter that you sent to the committee during recess, but could you explain a bit more how access to justice for young people will work following the exemption, if it is enacted?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
I suppose that, if young people are feeling othered or will not have those kinds of conversations with their teachers, that is a concern. Maybe that goes back to why RME is so important. How do we foster an inclusive culture of conversation, understanding and acceptance of difference? I wonder whether the cabinet secretary thinks that there is more that we can do. Maybe that is not about legislation at all, but about building a culture of inclusivity and acceptance. Are there other things, elsewhere, that we need to look at? The committee has looked at the public sector equality duty on local authorities and, therefore, on schools. Are we joining the dots on this?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thank you. There will be different views on whether the matter could be dealt with through the bill. Linked to that, given the concluding observations of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, which has twice—in 2016 and in 2023—suggested that children should have the right to withdraw from collective worship, which means RO, not RME, can you give us more detail of why you have not gone down the route of enacting those recommendations, which have been made twice in the past nine years?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
Yes.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
We will come to that issue.