The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1648 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
I will leave it there. Thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
Good afternoon. Before I start my questions, I put on record that I was, earlier this year, elected as rector of the University of Dundee, a post that I will take up in August this year, so I am not currently rector. When I am in that role, it will be a non-financial role.
Pam Duncan-Glancy has already referred to this quote from the Gillies report:
“The failure of the University’s financial governance system was self-inflicted and experienced multiple times and at multiple levels.”
Who should pay for that collective failure?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
We have talked a lot about when we knew what. I want to go back a little bit further, to April 2023, when the Scottish Trades Union Congress called the University of Dundee a “rogue employer” because of the way that the university was managing job losses and industrial action. Did the situation and that statement by the STUC give you any cause to think about how things might and should be done differently to improve relationships and to open up conversations with staff and the wider university community?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
You recall the phrase “rogue employer”. Did you attempt to do anything differently in relation to industrial relations by speaking to staff and students on campus or to improve how management was viewed by the wider university community?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
You have talked about trying to foster transparency and openness. Given that there were some very difficult relationships between the management and staff during your time on court, what was your approach to including staff, some of whom had been on strike for 12 weeks? They clearly felt that management was not there to support them and was not supporting them. Did you attempt to bridge the gap in communication and conversation with staff?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
I have some questions on how the court was supported to carry out its scrutiny role. I will start with Amanda Millar. What training and support were provided to court members so that lay members—people without the expertise or professional training that others on court would be expected to have—could understand the information, the financial reports and the other types of reports? At that level of governance of a large and complex organisation, there will be things that not everybody can understand. What support and training were court members given, either during induction or on an on-going basis?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
As somebody who sat on a university court for more than six years, I am aware of the different expertise and opportunities that the range of membership brings. Were you aware of any gaps in understanding, knowledge, skills or expertise? If so, did you do anything to try to remedy that situation?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
A couple of times this morning, you have said that the university did not have sufficient cash to maintain its assets. Surely, a risk alarm bell must have gone off because of that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
And the forecasts and modelling that you had done.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
We have had a little bit of discussion about culture, and I just want to pick up a couple of points about that. Jim McGeorge, in your role as chair of the equality, diversity and inclusion committee, were you aware of claims of misogyny, homophobia and, importantly, the fact that equality impact assessments were not always being conducted appropriately? Were you doing anything to challenge those things?