The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1989 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Okay. As was mentioned, the Climate Change Committee made it clear that electricity needs to be affordable. What role does the Scottish Government have in ensuring that low-carbon electricity is also low-cost electricity?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Will ScotWind’s build-out make electricity prices go down?
I am looking at the round 6 contracts for difference—CFD—prices. The CFD price for Green Volt, a project that you know about, is £139 per megawatt hour, which is based on 2012 prices. Is it realistic that the build-out of ScotWind will drive down electricity bills for consumers across Scotland?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Douglas Lumsden
How would you make the auction rounds and contracts for difference more favourable for Scottish projects? Would it be done by increasing the price?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Douglas Lumsden
We will agree that it is clear from what the Climate Change Committee has said that we need to get electricity prices down.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I will be brief, too. My questions are on engineered removals. How confident is the Government that it can deliver technologies such as direct air carbon capture and storage? Do we need a plan B if they do not work as we want them to?
12:00Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I will go back to the issue of electricity prices, which we touched on earlier, because it is so important.
Electrification is key to meeting our future targets. James Richardson, you said that electricity must be more affordable. How confident are you that electricity prices will start coming down in the future and what factors will mean that those prices do come down?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I need to pick up on a couple of those points. You said that market distortion—I think that was how you described it—is making electricity more expensive. What are the factors that make it more expensive? Are there levies or other things in people’s bills that make the cost higher than how much it actually costs to make that energy? What are those things?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I guess that it is net zero, not absolute zero.
I am just trying to understand what percentage we are talking about. Is it 1 per cent? Is it 5 per cent? What is the scale of our emissions that that project would remove?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Douglas Lumsden
So, is it correct to say that, whether Acorn goes ahead or not will be irrelevant to meeting our targets over the next two budgets?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Douglas Lumsden
The Acorn project would not account for that 10 per cent. I am just trying to understand how big an impact not having Acorn would make. I do not want to be in a situation in which our Governments in Holyrood and in Westminster play a blame game about why we have not reached our targets. I can imagine that some people will say that that is because we have not made progress on the Acorn project. I am trying to understand whether we can blame that for not meeting our targets, which is why I am trying to understand how much carbon Acorn would remove.