The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2163 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 15 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Thank you for your presentation this morning, Callum. I really enjoyed it. One of my concerns about the environmental fiscal measures is about the possibility of there being a disproportionate effect on some of our rural communities. I am thinking about the possibility of people in those areas having a greater reliance on private transport, but the issue is also relevant to public transport. It probably has a larger carbon footprint in rural areas than it does in the central belt because ferries are mainly diesel powered, because of the diesel high-speed trains that people depend on, and because air travel is important to some of our island communities. How can we ensure that anything that we introduce does not hit rural areas disproportionately?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 15 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
My other question is about the transient visitor levy. In your report, you refer to an “environmental tourism tax”. I have been a councillor for the past five years, and the TVL has been a difficult sell to many in the hospitality industry. One way round the issue is to say that all money that is raised will be reinvested in tourism to try to grow the industry. There seems to be a change, and the carrot has changed into a stick. Is that fair?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 15 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Thanks for that. As you say, we have to ensure that people in those areas are not disproportionately impacted.
With regard to energy from waste, you mentioned that we are not in quite as good a place as we thought that we were. Is a review being done of where we are with energy from waste? Should a moratorium be put in place until we have evaluated it?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Does Emma Congreve have a view on that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Following on from Liz Smith’s questions, am I right in thinking that this all comes down to our predicting the amount of money that we get back to be lower? If so, is that because our economic performance turned out not to be as good as we thought it might be? Is it fair to say that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Absolutely. I just wanted to check that there are local authorities coming forward with plans and that the money is there.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
If it is demand led, are we not telling people that it is there? Is there something else that we could be doing to make sure that the money that has been committed is spent?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
I have another question, on early intervention and prevention. Professor Heald, you mentioned in your submission that housing, for example, will have an impact on health outcomes. How does the Government make that shift from spend being input based to being output based? Do you have any ideas on how it could do that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Evaluation is a presentation of how spending some more money on, for example, local government can save you a lot on health later on. I guess that every Government wrestles with that difficulty, but it is something that has to be done eventually.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
You are so cynical at times, convener.
I want to go into a bit more detail about the linkage between the resource spending review and the national performance framework. Professor Heald, you mentioned in your submission that there are 81 indicators and that the Government has to prioritise those in the spending review. Is that number too many, or is it the right number and the review just needs to focus a bit more on some of the key indicators?