The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2163 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Exactly. The corporate body was not given the complete project spend. That makes it difficult for the corporate body not to approve it, because it does not know how much it is going to be in total over several years.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Douglas Lumsden
I will be brief, because I note that time has gotten away from us. I have a question about scrutiny and accountability. I imagine that the key recommendations that will come from the committee will include recommendations on whether we have a commissioner and on the role of Audit Scotland. Can you give an idea of what would the commissioner’s office would do most of the time? How many people are we talking about? How big a unit would it be?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Douglas Lumsden
The commissioner in Wales does not carry out an audit function such as that which is carried out by Audit Wales. I am trying to think what role Audit Scotland would play.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Finally, you have mentioned a road in Wales. Who would have carried out the function in relation to that road if there were no commissioner responsible for wellbeing?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Michelle Hegarty’s point suggests that that is a lesson that has been learned: there is an overall project cost.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Douglas Lumsden
This is my last point, convener. Was the scope of the project agreed at the outset, or is that something that has been added to over multiple years?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Douglas Lumsden
My question is not about the functionality of the website but about the project initiation process and governance. Was it an agreed project and who signed it off? Was the overall cost of the project budget approved and, if so, by whom? Was the scope of the project agreed and, if so, by whom? Were the timescales of the project agreed and, if so, by whom?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Douglas Lumsden
That is a complete failing. A project has been approved without people knowing its overall cost. It almost seems as though a framework agreement has been in place, which is more like a maintenance project for a website—just adding a bit more on every year. It did not go out to tender, so you did not know what the total cost was going to be—or maybe someone did—and you did not know what the scope would be because you had not drawn it up because there was no tender process. Am I wrong?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2022
Douglas Lumsden
That would be good, but would we not get full assurance if a proper investigation were to be done into the decision making on the contract?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2022
Douglas Lumsden
A full investigation would bring all those things together; it would show what has happened and what has gone wrong, and it would show the lessons learned and improvements that have been made so that the committee can be assured that everything is well.