Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 16 November 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2858 contributions

|

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Rosebank Oil and Gas Field

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Douglas Lumsden

Do you think that Gillian Martin’s constituents—

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Rosebank Oil and Gas Field

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Douglas Lumsden

I agree that it should not be a case of one thing or the other, but Labour’s ban on new licences is making it one thing or the other. Does the member not accept that the ban on new licences means that we will have to import more oil and gas?

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Douglas Lumsden

The fact that three north-east MSPs have lodged questions on the potential axing of the north of Scotland news programme shows how important we, on a cross-party basis, feel that it is that the local news coverage is retained. Does the cabinet secretary agree that, if the chief executive, Rufus Radcliffe, cannot make the north news work in light of STV North’s increasing profits, he should step aside and let someone else manage the company instead?

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Rosebank Oil and Gas Field

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Douglas Lumsden

I am sorry, but she is jet set in a way, Presiding Officer.

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Rosebank Oil and Gas Field

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Douglas Lumsden

I thank the Greens for bringing forward this debate and for lodging a simple motion: they oppose Rosebank—that is absolutely clear. In our amendment, we are absolutely clear that we support Rosebank. Let us look at the amendments from the other parties—what a load of spin and obfuscation. Why can they not just show a bit of honesty to the chamber and the people of the north-east and say whether they support or oppose the North Sea oil and gas sector and the thousands of jobs that it supports? While others dither, the Scottish Conservatives are crystal clear: we support the North Sea oil and gas sector. We are the only party in the Parliament that is clear on that.

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Rosebank Oil and Gas Field

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Douglas Lumsden

Now that the compatibility report for Rosebank has been published, does the Scottish Government support Rosebank? Yes or no?

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Rosebank Oil and Gas Field

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Douglas Lumsden

Okay, Presiding Officer.

We have the former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon in favour of a presumption against oil and gas; wannabe First Minister Stephen Flynn, pretending to be a friend of the industry; and John Swinney, with splinters in his backside from trying to sit on the fence, not telling us whether he supports or opposes Rosebank—but we all know that he is no friend of the industry.

Labour’s position is hardly clearer. Its front bench has said that

“our future does not lie in more oil and gas”,—[Official Report, House of Commons, 4 February 2025; Vol 761, c 658.]

while pressing ahead with a headline 78 per cent tax rate and scrapping investment allowances that underpin jobs and investment. That uncertainty drives away capital investment and places Scottish jobs at risk. In 2021, Anas Sarwar tweeted that it was time that Nicola Sturgeon opposed the ecological threat of the proposed Cambo oilfield, and yet, this week, he seems to have had a change of heart and pretends to be a supporter. He is so treacherous that he could be mistaken for Alan Carr, and that all matters because, at the end of the day, we are talking about people and their livelihoods.

Independent analysis warns that ill-judged policies could put up to 100,000 jobs at risk across the UK and strip out tens of billions of pounds of investment. The Scottish Affairs Committee has warned against accelerating decline, while clean energy jobs are not yet coming on stream at the pace that is required. We witnessed that this week at Aberdeen harbour, where redundancies were announced on the back of the oil and gas downturn.

We are going to be using hydrocarbons for years to come, so let us do that in a responsible way that uses home-grown production that supports British jobs and provides revenue for our vital public services. Let us get behind our oil and gas workers.

I move amendment S6M-19637.3, to leave out “opposes” and insert “supports”.

15:14  

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Rosebank Oil and Gas Field

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Douglas Lumsden

What does that have to do with the motion?

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Douglas Lumsden

To ask the Scottish Government whether the culture secretary has met with STV following recent reports of its plan to close its north of Scotland news programme. (S6O-05129)

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Rosebank Oil and Gas Field

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Douglas Lumsden

Sorry. Does the minister think that Gillian Martin’s constituents will be happy that she is one of the top 100 people in climate change when they see our constituencies being railroaded with pylons, substations and everything else?