The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1984 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Marra
You have given us some detail on the occupancy rate outside the building—the figure of 10 to 20 per cent is quite striking—but not for the campus here. Could you provide that information to us if you have it to hand?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Marra
I ask because, after a freedom of information request, a selection note was published on 18 August 2023 and it was stated that the methodology was agreed on 22 June 2023. Mr Farrow mentioned that the methodology was subsequently published on the website, which is welcome. However, 22 June 2023 is the same day as the decision was made.
The methodology was agreed on the same day as the decision was made. Do you think that that would be normal practice for the allocation of public funds, minister?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Marra
It does not sound very involved. It sounds as though there was one phone call.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Marra
Okay, because it says that the methodology was
“not discussed in great detail”
when it was agreed between ministers. That is in the response to the freedom of information request as well.
Perhaps you could come back with some clarity, minister, because you are leaning quite heavily on the idea that there was some kind of robust methodology. All the indications are that there really was not; there was a political stitch-up. So, if you can give us some more detail on that, that would be entirely welcome. Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Marra
Minister, you said that you were not the minister in charge at the start of the process, which I think dates back to 2023. What is your understanding of how the selection process was carried out?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Marra
I was elected for the first time at the start of session 6. It feels like total chaos to me. It does not feel like Parliament is handling this well, and the result is a mess of amendments. It also does not feel like we are getting good law at the end of it. However, I understand the restrictions. My issue with your submission is the use of the word “enhanced”—parliamentary business does not feel enhanced to me. Perhaps we could look at that in future.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Marra
Can you provide those criteria to the committee, in writing if not today? Perhaps your official wants to do so.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Marra
In relation to the commitment that was made to the convener, I would like some clarity on what the additional paragraphs might contain. It would be useful for the additional legislative responsibilities for office-holders to be itemised so that Parliament can have an understanding of its own actions and apply pressure, which was a theme that came through the work of the committee. Would it be possible to put that information in those paragraphs?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Marra
It might be that the Biometrics Commissioner’s work profile has changed since that session.
I am a bit concerned about the process. You mentioned the corporate body bearing down—rightly—and asking probing questions about some of the bids. The figures would be much higher across all the different areas—an additional 5 per cent was alluded to—had the corporate body not done its work. Is there a problem in the way that this works? Office-holders present you with bids rather than being told, “Here’s your budget. This is what you’re getting. You’ve got to be efficient enough to deal with it.”
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Marra
Given the work that the committee has undertaken on the office-holder landscape, you will understand why we were quite disappointed to see the costs continuing to rise quite considerably. It feels as though the Parliament has pulled up the drawbridge slightly, but we still have an existing problem, given that the costs are continuing to rise.
You mentioned some potential future options with regard to shared facilities. I frequently notice that parts of the Parliament building are quite empty for much of the week, because, I assume, people are working remotely or from home. What options are being looked at to try to make better use of the estate and bring some office-holders on to the campus?