The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1825 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michael Marra
As has been referenced, we are many years on from the dreadful tragedy that happened at Grenfell. Mr Henderson, has the use of the materials that Mr Drummond provocatively—and rightly—called “solid petrol” stopped in Scotland?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michael Marra
That is very useful, and I find myself strongly agreeing with your analysis. However, the issue that we are looking at is the design of the tax. As you have eloquently described it, it is one leg on a stool. I am trying to explore how effective that leg will be in supporting a better system.
If we were designing a tax to prevent poor practice, would it not be better for us to tie the tax in perpetuity to the people who have developed the building, rather than seeing it levied at a point of exchange?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michael Marra
Thank you for your evidence so far, Mr McGuire. I put on record my involvement in the Eljamel inquiry, as a representative of one of the victims.
You mentioned different categories of inquiry—a bricks-and-mortar inquiry, a service-failure inquiry and so on. Would something approaching a standardised model of operation for an inquiry help with the setting up of inquiries and address your concerns about the initial drafting of the terms of reference requiring significant amendment?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michael Marra
That is fair. Could I venture a slight categorisation of that, in relation to the need for quick lessons to be learned? We are told that we are still highly vulnerable to another pandemic, but, as the convener referenced, the inquiries will roll on for years and years. Setting the expense issue to the side, I worry that we will not learn the lessons in time to do something differently. Is that not a concern? We have talked a lot about money, but is the issue not how long it takes for all such inquiries to have an impact on people?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michael Marra
Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michael Marra
That is very useful. The mechanism by which that stopped is that the use of the materials has been banned on buildings and, at the point of completion, an inspection for a completion certificate from the local council would examine those materials and check that they are not on the banned list. Is that correct, for the layperson?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michael Marra
I would tend to strongly agree with that. The evidence that we have had is that there is a cycle of defects. Substandard building practices that lead to safety concerns have emerged in cycles over the years. RAAC is probably the most prominent of those issues at the moment, certainly in my home city of Dundee, in Aberdeen and in other parts of Scotland.
I am not sure how the tax would drive culture change in the industry. As much as the issue might require revenue, we might have to recognise that the tax, in the way that it is designed, is not necessarily going to make people change their behaviour as builders.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michael Marra
I agree that that is very challenging. I am exploring the principle of how we can ensure that we change the behaviour, within the marketplace, of people who are developers.
I come to the issue of pace. In October 2024, Scottish Government officials told the committee that the single building assessment programme, which establishes what cladding remediation work is required, is expected to
“take around 10 years ... to complete.”—[Official Report, Finance and Public Administration Committee, 29 October 2024; c 17.]
That is just for the assessment programme to find out what is required. Is that an acceptable amount of time, given the state that we are in, eight years on from Grenfell?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michael Marra
Mr Henderson, eight years post emergency, we are looking at another 10 years before we know the extent of the problem. That cannot be acceptable, can it?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michael Marra
As of August this year, 600 expressions of interest have been made to the cladding remediation programme, but there has been work on only two buildings in Scotland. Given the scale of the emergency that you have both described, you cannot think that that is acceptable, can you?